Suppr超能文献

固化方式对两种双重固化粘结系统与用于间接修复体的树脂粘结水门汀结合时与牙本质的微拉伸粘结强度的影响。

Effect of curing mode on microtensile bond strength to dentin of two dual-cured adhesive systems in combination with resin luting cements for indirect restorations.

作者信息

Arrais César Augusto Galvão, Giannini Marcelo, Rueggeberg Frederick A, Pashley David H

机构信息

University of Campinas, Piracicaba School of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Brazil.

出版信息

Oper Dent. 2007 Jan-Feb;32(1):37-44. doi: 10.2341/06-4.

Abstract

This study evaluated the microtensile bond strength (microTBS) of dual-cured adhesive systems when the different components were either light activated or left in the uncured state prior to cementation of an indirect composite restoration. Occlusal dentin surfaces of 40 human third molars were flattened. The teeth were randomly assigned to 8 groups (n = 5) according to the dual-cured systems (bonding agents/resin cements) and curing modes: All Bond 2/Duolink (AB2-BISCO Inc) and Optibond Solo Plus Dual Cure/Nexus 2 (SOLO-Kerr). Resin cements were applied to pre-cured resin composite discs (2 mm thick/Z-250/3M ESPE), which were fixed to dentin surfaces containing adhesive resin in either cured (LP) or uncured states (SP). The restored teeth were light activated according to the manufacturers' instructions (LRC-XL3000/3M ESPE) or allowed to self-cure (SRC). The restored teeth were water-stored at 37 degrees C for 24 hours. They were then both mesial-distally and buccal-lingually sectioned to obtain bonded specimens (1.2 mm2). Each specimen was tested in tension at a crosshead speed of 0.6 mm/minute until failure. Data (MPa (SD)) were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc test (p < .05). AB2/SP exhibited higher microTBS than AB2/LP (p = .00001); however, no significant differences were noted between SOLO/LP and SOLO/SP. Results suggested that dual-cured adhesive systems were as strong or even stronger when they were left in the uncured state prior to indirect resin composite cementation.

摘要

本研究评估了在间接复合树脂修复体粘结前,当双固化粘结系统的不同组分进行光固化或保持未固化状态时的微拉伸粘结强度(microTBS)。将40颗人第三磨牙的咬合面牙本质表面磨平。根据双固化系统(粘结剂/树脂水门汀)和固化方式,将牙齿随机分为8组(每组n = 5):全粘结剂2/多灵(AB2 - BISCO公司)和优化粘结剂单组分加双固化/内克瑟斯2(SOLO - 登士柏)。将树脂水门汀应用于预固化的树脂复合材料圆盘(2毫米厚/Z - 250/3M ESPE),这些圆盘固定在含有已固化(LP)或未固化(SP)粘结树脂的牙本质表面。根据制造商的说明(LRC - XL3000/3M ESPE)对修复后的牙齿进行光固化或使其自固化(SRC)。将修复后的牙齿在37℃下储存于水中24小时。然后将其沿近远中方向和颊舌方向切片,以获得粘结试件(1.2平方毫米)。以0.6毫米/分钟的十字头速度对每个试件进行拉伸测试,直至破坏。数据(MPa(标准差))通过双向方差分析和Tukey事后检验进行分析(p < 0.05)。AB2/SP组的微拉伸粘结强度高于AB2/LP组(p = 0.00001);然而,SOLO/LP组和SOLO/SP组之间未观察到显著差异。结果表明,在间接树脂复合材料粘结前保持未固化状态时,双固化粘结系统的强度相同甚至更强。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验