Li Wen, Zinbarg Richard E
Cognitive Neurology and Alzheimer's Disease Center, Northwestern University, USA.
Behav Modif. 2007 Mar;31(2):145-61. doi: 10.1177/0145445506296969.
The hypothesis that anxiety sensitivity (AS) is a risk factor for panic genesis has obtained compelling support, but the clinical/practical importance of AS in panic genesis has been questioned. In addition, the association between panic experience and AS increase has not been clearly demonstrated. Through this 1-year longitudinal study among college students, the authors replicated the vulnerability effect of AS on panic onset. By measuring AS according to its hierarchical structure, the authors found an AS subfactor--AS-Mental Incapacitation Concerns--to be a significant predictor of panic onset. The authors also demonstrate that AS is not only statistically significant but also clinically/pragmatically important for the onset of panic. The association between panic and increased AS was confirmed in this study, although it remains for future research to conclude whether this association should be attributed to a "scar effect" of panic. Theoretical and methodological issues regarding tests of the scar effect hypothesis are discussed.
焦虑敏感性(AS)是惊恐发作的一个风险因素这一假说已获得了有力支持,但AS在惊恐发作中的临床/实际重要性受到了质疑。此外,惊恐体验与AS增加之间的关联尚未得到明确证实。通过对大学生进行的这项为期1年的纵向研究,作者重现了AS对惊恐发作的易感性效应。通过根据其层次结构测量AS,作者发现一个AS子因素——对精神无能的担忧——是惊恐发作的一个重要预测因素。作者还证明,AS不仅在统计学上具有显著性,而且在惊恐发作方面在临床/实际中也很重要。尽管对于这种关联是否应归因于惊恐发作的“疤痕效应”仍有待未来研究得出结论,但本研究证实了惊恐与AS增加之间的关联。讨论了关于疤痕效应假说检验的理论和方法问题。