Ellison Tara I, Eckert Richard L, MacDonald Paul N
Department of Pharmacology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA.
J Biol Chem. 2007 Apr 13;282(15):10953-62. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M609717200. Epub 2007 Feb 19.
The vitamin D endocrine system plays critical although poorly understood roles in skin. Vitamin D receptor (VDR) knock-out (VDRKO) mice have defects in hair follicle cycling and keratinocyte proliferation leading to epidermal thickening, dermal cyst formation, and alopecia. Surprisingly, skin defects are not apparent in mice lacking 25-hydroxyvitamin D 1alpha-hydroxylase, the enzyme required for 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25(OH)2D3) hormone biosynthesis. These disparate phenotypes indicate that VDR effects in skin are independent of the 1,25(OH)2D3 ligand. However, cellular or molecular data supporting this hypothesis are lacking. Here, we show transcriptional activation of the vitamin D-responsive 24-hydroxylase promoter by VDR in primary keratinocytes that is independent of the 1,25(OH)2D3 ligand. This activity required functional vitamin D-responsive promoter elements as well as an intact VDR DNA binding domain and thus could not be distinguished from 1,25(OH)2D3-dependent VDR transactivation. The 1,25(OH)2D3-independent activation of VDR was also observed in keratinocytes from 1alpha-hydroxylase knock-out mice, indicating that it is not due to endogenous 1,25(OH)2D3 production. Mammalian two-hybrid studies showed strong, 1,25(OH)2D3-independent interaction between VDR and retinoid X receptors in primary keratinocytes, indicating that enhanced heterodimerization of these receptors was involved. Indeed, this 1,25(OH)2D3-independent VDR-RXR heterodimerization was sufficient to drive transactivation by VDR(L233S), an inactive ligand binding mutant of VDR that was previously shown to rescue the skin phenotype of VDR null mice. Cumulatively, these studies support the concept that transactivation by VDR in keratinocytes may be uncoupled from the 1,25(OH)2D3 ligand.
维生素D内分泌系统在皮肤中发挥着关键作用,尽管人们对这些作用了解甚少。维生素D受体(VDR)基因敲除(VDRKO)小鼠在毛囊周期和角质形成细胞增殖方面存在缺陷,导致表皮增厚、真皮囊肿形成和脱发。令人惊讶的是,在缺乏25-羟基维生素D 1α-羟化酶(1,25-二羟基维生素D3(1,25(OH)2D3)激素生物合成所需的酶)的小鼠中,皮肤缺陷并不明显。这些不同的表型表明VDR在皮肤中的作用独立于1,25(OH)2D3配体。然而,缺乏支持这一假设的细胞或分子数据。在此,我们展示了VDR在原代角质形成细胞中对维生素D反应性24-羟化酶启动子的转录激活,该激活独立于1,25(OH)2D3配体。这种活性需要功能性维生素D反应性启动子元件以及完整的VDR DNA结合结构域,因此无法与1,25(OH)2D3依赖性VDR反式激活区分开来。在1α-羟化酶基因敲除小鼠的角质形成细胞中也观察到了VDR的1,25(OH)2D3非依赖性激活,表明这不是由于内源性1,25(OH)2D3的产生。哺乳动物双杂交研究表明,在原代角质形成细胞中,VDR与视黄酸X受体之间存在强烈的、1,25(OH)2D3非依赖性相互作用,表明这些受体的异二聚化增强参与其中。事实上,这种1,25(OH)2D3非依赖性VDR-RXR异二聚化足以驱动VDR(L233S)的反式激活,VDR(L233S)是一种无活性的配体结合突变体,先前已证明它能挽救VDR基因缺失小鼠的皮肤表型。总的来说,这些研究支持了这样一个概念,即角质形成细胞中VDR的反式激活可能与1,25(OH)2D3配体解偶联。