Cuzick Jack, Forbes John F, Sestak Ivana, Cawthorn Simon, Hamed Hisham, Holli Kaija, Howell Anthony
Centre for Epidemiology, Mathematics, and Statistics, Cancer Research UK, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007 Feb 21;99(4):272-82. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djk049.
Initial results from the first International Breast Cancer Intervention Study (IBIS-I) found that tamoxifen reduced the risk of invasive estrogen receptor (ER)-positive tumors by 31% in women at increased risk for breast cancer, but most of the follow-up at this time was during the active treatment phase. We report an updated analysis of IBIS-I that focuses on the period after active treatment was completed, a time for which little evidence from other trials is available.
A total of 7145 women who were aged 35-70 years and at increased risk of breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive either tamoxifen (20 mg/day) or placebo for 5 years. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of breast cancer (including ductal carcinoma in situ), but side effects were also investigated. Relative risks were computed as the ratio of incidence rates. All statistical tests were two-sided.
After a median follow-up of 96 months after randomization, 142 breast cancers were diagnosed in the 3579 women in the tamoxifen group and 195 in the 3575 women in the placebo group (4.97 versus 6.82 per 1000 woman-years, respectively; risk ratio [RR] = 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.58 to 0.91, P = .004). The prophylactic effect of tamoxifen was fairly constant for the entire follow-up period, and no diminution of benefit was observed for up to 10 years after randomization. However, side effects in the tamoxifen group were much lower after completion of the active treatment period than during active treatment. For example, deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism were statistically significantly higher in the tamoxifen arm than in the placebo arm during active treatment (52 versus 23 cases, RR = 2.26, 95% CI = 1.36 to 3.87) but not after tamoxifen was stopped (16 versus 14 cases, RR = 1.14, 95% CI = 0.52 to 2.53). The two arms did not differ in the risk of ER-negative invasive tumors (35 in each arm, RR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.61 to 1.65) across the entire follow-up period, but the risk of ER-positive invasive breast cancer was 34% lower in the tamoxifen arm (87 versus 132 cases, RR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.50 to 0.87).
The risk-reducing effect of tamoxifen appears to persist for at least 10 years, but most side effects of tamoxifen do not continue after the 5-year treatment period.
首个国际乳腺癌干预研究(IBIS-I)的初步结果显示,他莫昔芬可使乳腺癌发病风险增加的女性发生浸润性雌激素受体(ER)阳性肿瘤的风险降低31%,但此时大部分随访是在积极治疗阶段进行的。我们报告了IBIS-I的一项更新分析,该分析聚焦于积极治疗结束后的时期,这一时期其他试验几乎没有相关证据。
共有7145名年龄在35至70岁、乳腺癌发病风险增加的女性被随机分配接受他莫昔芬(20毫克/天)或安慰剂治疗5年。主要结局指标是乳腺癌(包括导管原位癌)的发病率,但也对副作用进行了调查。相对风险计算为发病率之比。所有统计检验均为双侧检验。
随机分组后中位随访96个月,他莫昔芬组3579名女性中有142例被诊断为乳腺癌,安慰剂组3575名女性中有195例(分别为每1000妇女年4.97例和6.82例;风险比[RR]=0.73,95%置信区间[CI]=0.58至0.91,P = 0.004)。他莫昔芬的预防效果在整个随访期内相当稳定,随机分组后长达10年未观察到益处减少。然而,他莫昔芬组在积极治疗期结束后的副作用比积极治疗期间低得多。例如,在积极治疗期间,他莫昔芬组的深静脉血栓形成和肺栓塞在统计学上显著高于安慰剂组(52例对23例,RR = 2.26,95% CI = 1.36至3.87),但在停用他莫昔芬后则不然(16例对14例,RR = 1.14,95% CI = 0.52至2.53)。在整个随访期内,两组在ER阴性浸润性肿瘤的风险方面无差异(每组35例,RR = 1.00,95% CI = 0.61至1.65),但他莫昔芬组ER阳性浸润性乳腺癌的风险低34%(87例对132例,RR = 0.66,95% CI = 0.50至0.87)。
他莫昔芬的风险降低作用似乎至少持续10年,但他莫昔芬的大多数副作用在5年治疗期后不会持续存在。