Xu Ze-Mei, Wu Lian-Fang
Department of Obstetrics, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital University of Medical Science, Beijing 100026, China.
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2006 Nov;41(11):724-8.
To investigate the relationship between amniotic fluid glucose concentration, amniotic fluid volume and neonatal birth weight in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).
Two hundred and fifty-five singleton, normal term pregnant women were divided into three groups: GDM, gestational impaired glucose tolerance (GIGT) and normal pregnancy according to the results of a 50 g, 1 hour glucose challenge test (GCT) or of a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). There were 85 study subjects in each group. All women had GCT at 24 - 28 gestational weeks. When they had a positive GCT, in which glucose level was > or = 7.8 mmol/L, and < 10.6 mmol/L at 1 hour after oral 50 g glucose, they were required to have a 75 g OGTT. Amniotic fluid glucose concentration (AFG), amniotic fluid index (AFI), neonatal birth weight (NBW), maternal fasting glucose level (MFG) and umbilical venous glucose level (UvG) were compared in three groups. Statistical analysis of linear regression was done on these indices.
(1) The mean AFG in group GDM was (1.30 +/- 0.71) mmol/L, which was significantly greater than that in group GIGT, (1.02 +/- 0.57) mmol/L and that in normal group, (0.90 +/- 0.58) mmol/L. There were significant differences among three groups (P < 0.01). (2) In group GDM, the mean AFI was (16.1 +/- 4.6) cm, which was slightly greater than that in group GIGT, (14.8 +/- 4.3) cm (P > 0.05), but was significantly higher than that in normal group, (12.7 +/- 3.2) cm (P < 0.01). (3) The NBW of group GDM was (3612 +/- 510) g, which was lower than that of group GIGT, (3694 +/- 490) g, and higher than that of normal group, (3487 +/- 458) g, but there were no significant differences among three groups (P > 0.05). (4) Among women with GDM, AFG was significantly correlated with AFI (r = 0.330, P = 0.002), NBW (r = 0.347, P = 0.001), MFG (r = 0.589, P < 0.01), and with UvG (r = 0.218, P = 0.045). But in group GIGT and normal group, AFG was only correlated with AFI. (5) In GDM group, the AFG, (1.02 +/- 0.50) mmol/L; AFI, (13.9 +/- 4.2) cm; and NBW, (3497 +/- 475) g in women who had ideal blood glucose level were significantly lower than that in women whose blood glucose levels were not well-controlled [AFG, (1.92 +/- 0.76) mmol/L, AFI, (16.4 +/- 4.4) cm, NBW, (3869 +/- 481) g (P < 0.01, P < 0.05, P < 0.01)], and the mean values of these three indices were close to those of the control group.
In the cohort with GDM, there were correlations between AFG, AFI, and NBW. The results show that an active management could significantly improve the prognoses of the diabetes mothers and their fetuses.
探讨妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)患者羊水葡萄糖浓度、羊水量与新生儿出生体重之间的关系。
根据50g、1小时葡萄糖耐量试验(GCT)或75g口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)结果,将255名单胎足月孕妇分为三组:GDM组、妊娠期糖耐量受损(GIGT)组和正常妊娠组。每组85例研究对象。所有孕妇在妊娠24 - 28周时进行GCT。当GCT结果为阳性,即口服50g葡萄糖后1小时血糖水平≥7.8mmol/L且<10.6mmol/L时,需进行75g OGTT。比较三组的羊水葡萄糖浓度(AFG)、羊水指数(AFI)、新生儿出生体重(NBW)、孕妇空腹血糖水平(MFG)和脐静脉血糖水平(UvG)。对这些指标进行线性回归统计分析。
(1)GDM组平均AFG为(1.30±0.71)mmol/L,显著高于GIGT组的(1.02±0.57)mmol/L和正常组的(0.90±0.58)mmol/L。三组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。(2)GDM组平均AFI为(16.1±4.6)cm,略高于GIGT组的(14.8±4.3)cm(P>0.05),但显著高于正常组的(12.7±3.2)cm(P<0.01)。(3)GDM组NBW为(3612±510)g,低于GIGT组的(3694±490)g,高于正常组的(3487±458)g,但三组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。(4)在GDM患者中,AFG与AFI(r = 0.330,P = 0.002)、NBW(r = 0.347,P = 0.001)、MFG(r = 0.589,P<0.01)及UvG(r = 0.218,P = 0.045)显著相关。但在GIGT组和正常组中,AFG仅与AFI相关。(5)GDM组中,血糖控制理想的孕妇AFG为(1.02±0.50)mmol/L、AFI为(13.9±4.2)cm、NBW为(3497±475)g,均显著低于血糖控制不佳孕妇的[AFG为(1.92±0.76)mmol/L、AFI为(16.4±4.4)cm、NBW为(3869±481)g(P<0.01,P<0.05,P<0.01)],且这三个指标的平均值接近对照组。
在GDM队列中,AFG、AFI与NBW之间存在相关性。结果表明,积极管理可显著改善糖尿病母亲及其胎儿的预后。