Suppr超能文献

在游离皮瓣移植中逆向静脉血流是否安全?桡侧前臂皮瓣面临的一个困境。

Is reversed venous flow safe in free-flap transfer? A dilemma with the radial forearm flap.

作者信息

Stewart D H, Puckett C L

机构信息

Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Missouri Health Sciences Center, Columbia.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992 Feb;89(2):237-42. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199202000-00006.

Abstract

The distally based radial artery forearm flap has become our workhorse flap for hand and finger coverage, relying on reversed or retrograde venous outflow through the venae comitantes. Free-flap transfer, however, has been used by us only with antegrade venous anastomoses. This study was intended to determine if a single retrograde venous anastomosis would be adequate for flap viability. Six groups of saphenous flaps were developed in New Zealand White rabbits. In situ flaps compared antegrade with retrograde venous outflow in groups 1 and 2. Microvascular venous anastomoses with antegrade or retrograde outflow were compared in groups 3 and 4. Free-flap transfer with antegrade or retrograde venous outflow was compared in groups 5 and 6. No significant differences in survival was found between groups 1 and 2. A significant difference in survival (p = 0.025) was found between groups 3 and 4, but technical differences make these groups incomparable. Significantly better survival (p = 0.014, chi-squared test) was found in group 5 with antegrade outflow versus group 6 with retrograde outflow.

摘要

以远端为蒂的桡动脉前臂皮瓣已成为我们用于覆盖手部和手指的主要皮瓣,其依靠伴行静脉进行逆向或逆行静脉回流。然而,我们仅在顺行静脉吻合时使用游离皮瓣移植。本研究旨在确定单一逆行静脉吻合是否足以维持皮瓣存活。在新西兰白兔身上制备了六组隐静脉皮瓣。第1组和第2组的原位皮瓣比较了顺行与逆行静脉回流情况。第3组和第4组比较了顺行或逆行流出的微血管静脉吻合情况。第5组和第6组比较了顺行或逆行静脉回流的游离皮瓣移植情况。第1组和第2组之间在皮瓣存活方面未发现显著差异。第3组和第4组之间在皮瓣存活方面发现了显著差异(p = 0.025),但技术差异使这两组无可比性。第5组顺行流出的皮瓣存活情况明显优于第6组逆行流出的皮瓣(p = 0.014,卡方检验)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验