Bromberger Joyce T, Matthews Karen A, Schott Laura L, Brockwell Sarah, Avis Nancy E, Kravitz Howard M, Everson-Rose Susan A, Gold Ellen B, Sowers MaryFran, Randolph John F
Department of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
J Affect Disord. 2007 Nov;103(1-3):267-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2007.01.034. Epub 2007 Feb 28.
The influence of menopausal status on depressive symptoms is unclear in diverse ethnic groups. This study examined the longitudinal relationship between changes in menopausal status and the risk of clinically relevant depressive symptoms and whether the relationship differed according to initial depressive symptom level.
3302 African American, Chinese, Hispanic, Japanese, and White women, aged 42-52 years at entry into the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN), a community-based, multisite longitudinal observational study, were evaluated annually from 1995 through 2002. Random effects multiple logistic regression analyses were used to determine the relationship between menopausal status and prevalence of low and high depressive symptom scores (CES-D <16 or > or =16) over 5 years.
At baseline, 23% of the sample had elevated CES-D scores. A woman was more likely to report CES-D > or =16 when she was early peri-, late peri-, postmenopausal or currently/formerly using hormone therapy (HT), relative to when she was premenopausal (OR range 1.30 to 1.71). Effects were somewhat stronger for women with low CES-D scores at baseline. Health and psychosocial factors increased the odds of having a high CES-D and in some cases, were more important than menopausal status.
We used a measure of current depressive symptoms rather than a diagnosis of clinical depression. Thus, we can only make conclusions about symptoms current at annual assessments.
Most midlife women do not experience high depressive symptoms. Those that do are more likely to experience high depressive symptom levels when perimenopausal or postmenopausal than when premenopausal, independent of factors such as difficulty paying for basics, negative attitudes, poor perceived health, and stressful events.
在不同种族群体中,绝经状态对抑郁症状的影响尚不清楚。本研究探讨了绝经状态变化与临床相关抑郁症状风险之间的纵向关系,以及这种关系是否因初始抑郁症状水平而异。
3302名年龄在42 - 52岁之间的非裔美国、华裔、西班牙裔、日裔和白人女性参与了全国女性健康研究(SWAN),这是一项基于社区的多地点纵向观察性研究。从1995年至2002年,每年对她们进行评估。采用随机效应多元逻辑回归分析来确定绝经状态与5年内低、高抑郁症状评分(CES - D<16或≥16)患病率之间的关系。
在基线时,23%的样本CES - D评分升高。与绝经前相比,处于围绝经期早期、围绝经期晚期、绝经后或目前/以前使用激素治疗(HT)的女性更有可能报告CES - D≥16(OR范围为1.30至1.71)。对于基线时CES - D评分较低的女性,影响更为明显。健康和心理社会因素增加了CES - D评分高的几率,在某些情况下,比绝经状态更重要。
我们使用的是当前抑郁症状的测量方法,而不是临床抑郁症的诊断。因此,我们只能对年度评估时的当前症状得出结论。
大多数中年女性没有经历高度抑郁症状。那些经历过的女性在围绝经期或绝经后比绝经前更有可能经历高度抑郁症状水平,这与诸如基本生活费用支付困难、消极态度、健康状况不佳和压力事件等因素无关。