Radhakrishna S, Frieden Thomas R, Subramani R, Santha T, Narayanan P R
Tuberculosis Research Centre, Chennai, India.
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2007 Mar;11(3):282-8.
To assess the additional risk to household contacts from an infectious case of tuberculosis (TB) at home in a rural community in south India.
In all, 3506 contacts of smear-positive (S+C+) and 2910 contacts of smear-negative TB cases (S-C+) and 246 845 persons with no TB case at home were followed for 15 years, with a repeat survey every 2.5 years consisting of radiographic and sputum examination, selective follow-up of high-risk individuals and passive surveillance. If a case developed during follow-up, all household members were subsequently considered as contacts. Cox's proportional hazards model (multivariate) was employed to compare incidences.
The annual incidence of culture-positive TB was respectively 526 and 271 per 100000 population for contacts of smear-positive and smear-negative patients, and 198/100000 in non-contacts. The adjusted hazard rate was 3.4 for contacts of smear-positive patients (95% CI 3.0-3.9) and 1.7 for contacts of smear-negative patients (95% CI 1.4-2.0) as compared to non-contacts. Of 3942 incident cases, 337 (8.5%) came from households with a TB case.
Although family contacts had a significantly higher incidence, their contribution to total new caseload was meagre. Contact chemoprophylaxis as a public health measure would therefore have limited impact on community TB incidence.
评估印度南部一个农村社区中,家庭接触者因家中有传染性肺结核(TB)病例而面临的额外风险。
总共对3506名涂片阳性(S+C+)结核病病例的接触者、2910名涂片阴性结核病病例(S-C+)的接触者以及246845名家中无结核病病例的人员进行了15年的随访,每2.5年进行一次重复调查,包括影像学和痰液检查、对高危个体的选择性随访以及被动监测。如果在随访期间出现病例,则随后将所有家庭成员视为接触者。采用Cox比例风险模型(多变量)比较发病率。
涂片阳性和涂片阴性患者接触者中,每10万人口中培养阳性结核病的年发病率分别为526和271,非接触者为198/10万。与非接触者相比,涂片阳性患者接触者的调整后风险率为3.4(95%CI 3.0-3.9),涂片阴性患者接触者为1.7(95%CI 1.4-2.0)。在3942例新发病例中,337例(8.5%)来自有结核病病例的家庭。
虽然家庭接触者的发病率显著更高,但他们对新增病例总数的贡献微不足道。因此,作为一项公共卫生措施,接触者化学预防对社区结核病发病率的影响有限。