Jauchem James R, Cook Michael C
U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory, Human Effectiveness Directorate, Directed Energy Bioeffects Division, Brooks City-Base, San Antonio, TX 78235-5147, USA.
Mil Med. 2007 Feb;172(2):182-9. doi: 10.7205/milmed.172.2.182.
There have been many previous claims of nonlethal acoustic weapon effects, mostly in the popular rather than the scientific literature. Anecdotal reports of extraordinary effects can make meaningful assessment and review of this area very difficult. Acoustics research has shown that the nonlethal weapon capabilities of audible sound generators have been grossly overstated. Although high-intensity infrasound significantly disrupted animal behavior in some experiments, the generation of such energy in a volume large enough to be of practical use is unlikely because of basic physical principles. On the basis of experimentation completed to date at a number of institutions, it seems unlikely that high-intensity acoustic energy in the audible, infrasonic, or low-frequency range can provide a device suitable for use as a nonlethal weapon.
此前已有许多关于非致命性声学武器效应的说法,大多出现在大众文献而非科学文献中。关于奇特效应的轶事报道使得对该领域进行有意义的评估和审查变得非常困难。声学研究表明,可听声发生器的非致命武器能力被严重夸大了。尽管在一些实验中高强度次声显著扰乱了动物行为,但由于基本物理原理,不太可能产生足以实际应用的大量此类能量。根据一些机构迄今为止完成的实验,在可听、次声或低频范围内的高强度声能似乎不太可能提供一种适合用作非致命武器的装置。