Suppr超能文献

逼尿肌过度活动不能预测骶神经调节试验刺激的结果。

Detrusor overactivity does not predict outcome of sacral neuromodulation test stimulation.

作者信息

South Mary M T, Romero Audrey A, Jamison Margaret G, Webster George D, Amundsen Cindy L

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Urogynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.

出版信息

Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2007 Dec;18(12):1395-8. doi: 10.1007/s00192-007-0351-7. Epub 2007 Mar 16.

Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine if urodynamic findings in patients with urge incontinence predicts response to sacral neuromodulation test stimulation. One hundred four patients with refractory urinary urge incontinence who had undergone sacral neuromodulation test stimulation were retrospectively reviewed. Pre- and post-test stimulation incontinence parameters and pelvic floor muscle (PFM) contraction strength was documented. Urodynamics were reviewed on all patients, and the presence or absence of detrusor overactivity (DO) was noted. Patients were then divided into two groups: responders to the test stimulation and non-responders. A positive response was considered to be a >or=50% improvement in the number of incontinent episodes per day (IE/day) and/or pad weight with test stimulation. Of the 104 patients evaluated, 64% (N = 67) responded to the test stimulation, while 36% (N = 37) were non-responders. The mean age was 59.7 and 67.0 among responders and non-responders (p = .01). There was a significant difference in the number of IE/day between non-responders and responders (p = .02). There was no relationship found between the presence or absence of DO and the likelihood for test stimulation success, patient demographics or pre test stimulation incontinence variables. Our study provides no statistically significant evidence that the presence or absence of DO on urodynamics predicts a response to sacral neuromodulation test stimulation. An important finding, however, was that patients without demonstrable DO on urodynamics may still have a positive response to sacral neuromodulation.

摘要

本研究的目的是确定尿急失禁患者的尿动力学检查结果是否能预测骶神经调节测试刺激的反应。对104例接受骶神经调节测试刺激的难治性尿急失禁患者进行了回顾性研究。记录测试刺激前后的失禁参数和盆底肌肉(PFM)收缩强度。对所有患者进行尿动力学检查,并记录是否存在逼尿肌过度活动(DO)。然后将患者分为两组:测试刺激反应者和无反应者。阳性反应被定义为测试刺激后每天失禁发作次数(IE/天)和/或尿垫重量改善≥50%。在104例接受评估的患者中,64%(N = 67)对测试刺激有反应,而36%(N = 37)无反应。反应者和无反应者的平均年龄分别为59.7岁和67.0岁(p = 0.01)。无反应者和反应者之间的IE/天数量存在显著差异(p = 0.02)。未发现DO的存在与否与测试刺激成功的可能性、患者人口统计学特征或测试前刺激失禁变量之间存在关联。我们的研究没有提供统计学上显著的证据表明尿动力学检查中DO的存在与否能预测骶神经调节测试刺激的反应。然而,一个重要的发现是,尿动力学检查未显示DO的患者对骶神经调节仍可能有阳性反应。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验