Suppr超能文献

两种不同给药方式下卵巢癌顺铂和紫杉醇耐药细胞系的生物学比较。

Biological comparison of ovarian cancer resistant cell lines to cisplatin and Taxol by two different administrations.

作者信息

Yan Xue-Dong, Li Min, Yuan Ye, Mao Ning, Pan Ling-Ya

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing 100730, PR China.

出版信息

Oncol Rep. 2007 May;17(5):1163-9.

Abstract

Drug resistance is one of the major obstacles to chemotherapy of ovarian cancer. Studies with cell lines can serve as an initial screen for agents that might modulate drug resistance. To establish more appropriate models of drug resistance and explore whether the differences exist in the different drug resistant sublines selected by different treatments, we induced SKOV3 cell line using cisplatin (CDDP) and Taxol over a period of 16 months by the pulse (SKOV3/CDDP-P and SKOV3/Taxol-P) and intermittent incremental (SKOV3/CDDP-80 and SKOV3/Taxol-25) method, respectively. The resistant phenotype of the four resistant sublines, SKOV3/CDDP-P, SKOV3/CDDP-80, SKOV3/Taxol-P and SKOV3/Taxol-25, was very stable and the resistance index was 4.12, 11.50, 261.98 and 622.76, respectively. In cell morphology, the cells from pulse treatment had remarkable changes compared with the cells from intermittent incremental treatment. SKOV3/CDDP-80 and SKOV3/Taxol-P grew more slowly than SKOV3/CDDP-P and SKOV3/Taxol-25. Multidrug resistance gene 1, multidrug resistance protein 1, lung resistance protein and glutathione S-transferase pi mRNA expression of SKOV3/CDDP-P and SKOV3/Taxol-25 had greater changes than that of SKOV3/CDDP-80 and SKOV3/Taxol-P. The results suggest there are great differences between the resistant cell lines resulting from pulse and intermittent incremental method. The resistant cells selected by the intermittent method were more resistant than the cells selected by the pulse method. The two resistant sublines selected by the pulse method may serve as appropriate models for the study of mechanisms of drug resistance in ovarian cancer.

摘要

耐药性是卵巢癌化疗的主要障碍之一。细胞系研究可作为筛选可能调节耐药性药物的初步方法。为建立更合适的耐药模型,并探究不同处理方式筛选出的不同耐药亚系之间是否存在差异,我们分别采用脉冲法(SKOV3/CDDP-P和SKOV3/Taxol-P)和间歇递增法(SKOV3/CDDP-80和SKOV3/Taxol-25),用顺铂(CDDP)和紫杉醇对SKOV3细胞系进行了16个月的诱导。四个耐药亚系SKOV3/CDDP-P、SKOV3/CDDP-80、SKOV3/Taxol-P和SKOV3/Taxol-25的耐药表型非常稳定,耐药指数分别为4.12、11.50、261.98和622.76。在细胞形态方面,脉冲处理组的细胞与间歇递增处理组的细胞相比有显著变化。SKOV3/CDDP-80和SKOV3/Taxol-P的生长速度比SKOV3/CDDP-P和SKOV3/Taxol-25慢。SKOV3/CDDP-P和SKOV3/Taxol-25的多药耐药基因1、多药耐药蛋白1、肺耐药蛋白和谷胱甘肽S-转移酶pi mRNA表达变化比SKOV3/CDDP-80和SKOV3/Taxol-P更大。结果表明,脉冲法和间歇递增法产生的耐药细胞系之间存在很大差异。间歇法筛选出的耐药细胞比脉冲法筛选出的细胞耐药性更强。脉冲法筛选出的两个耐药亚系可作为研究卵巢癌耐药机制的合适模型。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验