Jones J H, Ohmura H, Stanley S D, Hiraga A
Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, California 95616, USA.
Equine Vet J Suppl. 2006 Aug(36):365-9. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2006.tb05570.x.
Human athletes run faster and experience fewer injuries when running on surfaces with a stiffness 'tuned' to their bodies. We questioned if the same might be true for horses, and if so, would running on surfaces of different stiffness cause a measurable change in the amount of energy required to move at a given speed?
Different brands of commercial treadmills have pans of unequal stiffness, and this difference would result in different metabolic power requirements to locomote at a given speed.
We tested for differences in stiffness between a Mustang 2200 and a Säto I commercial treadmill by incrementally loading each treadmill near the centre of the pan with fixed weights and measuring the displacement of the pan as weights were added or removed from the pan. We trained six 3-year-old Thoroughbreds to run on the 2 treadmills. After 4 months the horses ran with reproducible specific maximum rates of O2 consumption (VO2max/kg bwt, 2.62 +/- 0.23 (s.d.) mlO2 STPD/sec/kg) at 14.2 +/- 0.7 (s.d.) m/sec. They were alternately run on the 2 treadmills at identical grade (0.40 +/- 0.02%) and speeds (1.83 (walk), 4.0 (trot) and 8.0 (canter) m/sec, all +/- 0.03 m/sec) while wearing an open-flow mask for measurement of VO2.
The Mustang treadmill was over 6 times stiffer than the Säto. The VO2/kg bwt increased by approximately 4-fold over the range of speeds studied on both treadmills. Oxygen consumption was significantly lower at all speeds for the Mustang treadmill compared to the Säto. The fractional difference in energy cost decreased by a factor of 6 with increasing speed, although absolute difference in cost was relatively constant.
We suggest it costs less energy for horses to walk, trot or canter on a stiffer treadmill than on a more compliant treadmill, at least within the ranges of stiffness evaluated.
It may be possible to define a substrate stiffness 'tuned' to a horse's body enabling maximal energetic economy when running. The differences between treadmills allows more accurate comparisons between physiological studies conducted on treadmills of different stiffness, and might help to identify an ideal track stiffness to reduce locomotor injuries in equine athletes.
人类运动员在具有与自身身体“匹配”刚度的表面上跑步时,速度更快且受伤更少。我们质疑这对马是否同样适用,如果是这样,在不同刚度的表面上跑步是否会导致以给定速度移动所需能量产生可测量的变化?
不同品牌的商用跑步机跑台刚度不同,这种差异会导致以给定速度移动时的代谢功率需求不同。
我们通过在跑台中心附近逐渐加载固定重量来测试Mustang 2200和Säto I商用跑步机之间的刚度差异,并在向跑台添加或移除重量时测量跑台的位移。我们训练了6匹3岁的纯种马在这两种跑步机上跑步。4个月后,这些马在14.2±0.7(标准差)米/秒的速度下以可重复的特定最大耗氧率(VO2max/千克体重,2.62±0.23(标准差)毫升O2 STPD/秒/千克)奔跑。它们交替在这两种跑步机上以相同坡度(0.40±0.02%)和速度(1.83(步行)、4.0(小跑)和8.0(慢跑)米/秒,均±0.03米/秒)奔跑,同时佩戴开放式面罩以测量VO2。
Mustang跑步机的刚度比Säto跑步机高6倍多。在两种跑步机上研究的速度范围内,VO2/千克体重增加了约4倍。与Säto跑步机相比,Mustang跑步机在所有速度下的耗氧量都显著更低。随着速度增加,能量成本的分数差异降低了6倍,尽管成本的绝对差异相对恒定。
我们认为,至少在所评估的刚度范围内,马在刚度较大的跑步机上行走、小跑或慢跑比在更柔软的跑步机上消耗的能量更少。
有可能定义一种与马的身体“匹配”的底物刚度,使跑步时实现最大能量经济性。跑步机之间的差异允许在不同刚度的跑步机上进行的生理研究之间进行更准确的比较,并可能有助于确定理想的跑道刚度,以减少马类运动员的运动损伤。