Suppr超能文献

药物性肝损伤

Drug-induced liver injury.

作者信息

Abboud Gebran, Kaplowitz Neil

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.

出版信息

Drug Saf. 2007;30(4):277-94. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200730040-00001.

Abstract

Drug-induced liver injury is a frequent cause of hepatic dysfunction. Reliably establishing whether the liver disease was caused by a drug requires the exclusion of other plausible causes and the search for a clinical drug signature. The drug signature consists of the pattern of liver test abnormality, the duration of latency to symptomatic presentation, the presence or absence of immune-mediated hypersensitivity and the response to drug withdrawal. Determination of causality also includes an evaluation of individual susceptibility to drug-induced liver injury. This susceptibility is governed by both genetic and environmental factors. Components of the drug signature in conjunction with certain risk factors have been incorporated into formal scoring systems that are predictive of the likelihood of drug-induced liver injury. The most validated scoring system is the Roussel-Uclaf causality assessment method, which nonetheless retains certain imperfections. Mitigating the potential for drug-induced liver injury is achieved by the identification of toxicity signals during clinical trials and the monitoring of liver tests in clinical practice. There are three signals of liver toxicity in clinical trials: (i) a statistically significant doubling (or more) in the incidence of serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevation >3 x the upper limit of normal (ULN); (ii) any incidence of serum ALT elevation >8-10 x ULN; and (iii) any incidence of serum ALT elevation >3 x ULN accompanied by a serum bilirubin elevation >2 x ULN. Monitoring of liver tests in clinical practice has shown unconvincing efficacy, but where a benefit-risk analysis would favour continued therapy, monthly monitoring may have some benefit compared with no monitoring at all. With rare exception, treatment of drug-induced liver injury is principally supportive. Drug toxicity is the most common cause of acute liver failure, defined as a prolonged prothrombin time (international normalised ratio > or =1.5) and any degree of mental alteration occurring <26 weeks after the onset of illness in a patient without pre-existing cirrhosis. A patient who meets these criteria must be evaluated for liver transplantation. The pathogenesis of drug-induced liver injury can be examined on the basis of the two principal patterns of injury. The hepatocellular pattern is characterised by a predominant rise in the level of transaminases and results from the demise of hepatocytes by means of either apoptosis or necrosis. The cholestatic pattern is characterised by a predominant rise of the serum alkaline phosphatase level and usually results from injury to the bile ductular cells either directly by the drug or its metabolite, or indirectly by an adaptive immune response.

摘要

药物性肝损伤是肝功能障碍的常见原因。要可靠地确定肝病是否由药物引起,需要排除其他可能的病因,并寻找临床药物特征。药物特征包括肝功能检查异常模式、出现症状的潜伏期、免疫介导的超敏反应的有无以及停药反应。因果关系的判定还包括评估个体对药物性肝损伤的易感性。这种易感性受遗传和环境因素共同影响。药物特征的组成部分与某些风险因素已被纳入正式的评分系统,这些系统可预测药物性肝损伤的可能性。最有效的评分系统是罗塞尔 - 优克福因果关系评估方法,不过该方法仍存在某些缺陷。通过在临床试验中识别毒性信号以及在临床实践中监测肝功能检查来降低药物性肝损伤的可能性。临床试验中有三种肝毒性信号:(i)血清丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)升高>正常上限(ULN)3倍的发生率在统计学上显著翻倍(或更多);(ii)血清ALT升高>8 - 10×ULN的任何发生率;(iii)血清ALT升高>3×ULN且伴有血清胆红素升高>2×ULN的任何发生率。临床实践中对肝功能检查的监测效果并不令人信服,但在效益风险分析支持继续治疗的情况下,与完全不监测相比,每月监测可能会有一些益处。除极少数情况外,药物性肝损伤的治疗主要是支持性的。药物毒性是急性肝衰竭最常见的原因,急性肝衰竭定义为在无肝硬化病史的患者中,发病后<26周出现凝血酶原时间延长(国际标准化比值>或 =1.5)以及任何程度的精神状态改变。符合这些标准的患者必须接受肝移植评估。药物性肝损伤的发病机制可根据两种主要损伤模式进行研究。肝细胞损伤模式的特征是转氨酶水平主要升高,是由肝细胞通过凋亡或坏死死亡所致。胆汁淤积模式的特征是血清碱性磷酸酶水平主要升高,通常是由药物或其代谢产物直接损伤胆小管细胞,或由适应性免疫反应间接损伤所致。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验