Suppr超能文献

针对先前化疗失败的中国非小细胞肺癌患者的挽救性治疗。

Salvage therapy for Chinese non-small cell lung cancer patients who failed previous chemotherapy.

作者信息

Chen Yuh-Min, Perng Reury-Perng, Shih Jen-Fu, Tsai Chun-Ming, Whang-Peng Jacqueline

机构信息

Chest Department, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Thorac Oncol. 2006 Jul;1(6):545-50.

Abstract

Our aim was to determine the appropriate salvage regimen for Chinese non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who failed previous chemotherapy. We retrospectively analyzed data from our seven clinical trials, including single-agent gemcitabine, gefitinib, docetaxel with a different schedule, vinorelbine plus cisplatin, vinorelbine plus gemcitabine, docetaxel plus gemcitabine, and docetaxel plus ifosfamide, with a total of 342 cases (including 314 patients, of which 28 entered two different trials due to different salvage line settings), and compared these data with those of other studies, addressing the efficacy and toxicity of salvage therapy in patients who failed previous chemotherapy to analyze choosing of an appropriate salvage regimen. Of the 342 cases receiving salvage treatment, 71.1% were in second-line treatment, and 28.9% in third-line or later treatment. The response rate to our salvage therapy ranged widely, from 6.1% to 36.1%. Median survival was between 5.7 and 8.4 months when different salvage chemotherapy regimens were used, whereas it was 9.3 months in those who received gefitinib treatment. Similarly, 1-year survival ranged between 19.7% and 40% in a chemotherapy setting, and 40.8% for gefitinib treatment. Those who received gefitinib had better toxicity profiles than those who received other regimens. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 19 patients who received a chemotherapy agent (6.2%), and four patients died despite granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and antibiotic treatment. Grade 3 or 4 interstitial pneumonitis occurred in 14 of 247 patients (5.7%) who received docetaxel with/without another agent, and 10 patients died. Grade 3 interstitial pneumonitis occurred in one patient who received gefitinib treatment and recovered. In conclusion, both chemotherapeutic agents, such as docetaxel alone or gemcitabine plus vinorelbine, and gefitinib, are probably appropriate salvage regimens for Chinese NSCLC patients who have failed previous chemotherapy. However, gefitinib has a better safety profile and probably better survival than the chemotherapeutic agents and would be an appropriate alternative choice for salvage chemotherapy, even in a second-line setting for Chinese patients.

摘要

我们的目的是确定适合既往化疗失败的中国非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的挽救治疗方案。我们回顾性分析了来自7项临床试验的数据,这些试验包括单药吉西他滨、吉非替尼、不同给药方案的多西他赛、长春瑞滨联合顺铂、长春瑞滨联合吉西他滨、多西他赛联合吉西他滨以及多西他赛联合异环磷酰胺,共342例(包括314例患者,其中28例因不同的挽救治疗线设置进入两项不同试验),并将这些数据与其他研究的数据进行比较,以探讨既往化疗失败患者挽救治疗的疗效和毒性,从而分析合适挽救方案的选择。在接受挽救治疗的342例患者中,71.1%处于二线治疗,28.9%处于三线或更后线治疗。我们的挽救治疗的缓解率差异很大,从6.1%到36.1%。使用不同的挽救化疗方案时,中位生存期在5.7至8.4个月之间,而接受吉非替尼治疗的患者中位生存期为9.3个月。同样,化疗组的1年生存率在19.7%至40%之间,吉非替尼治疗组为40.8%。接受吉非替尼治疗的患者的毒性反应比接受其他方案的患者更好。19例接受化疗药物的患者发生发热性中性粒细胞减少(6.2%),尽管使用了粒细胞集落刺激因子和抗生素治疗,仍有4例患者死亡。在247例接受多西他赛联合或不联合其他药物治疗的患者中,14例(5.7%)发生3级或4级间质性肺炎,10例患者死亡。1例接受吉非替尼治疗的患者发生3级间质性肺炎,但已康复。总之,对于既往化疗失败的中国NSCLC患者,化疗药物如单药多西他赛或吉西他滨联合长春瑞滨以及吉非替尼可能都是合适的挽救方案。然而,吉非替尼具有更好的安全性,可能比化疗药物有更好的生存期,即使在中国患者的二线治疗中,也将是挽救化疗的合适替代选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验