Song Yun Seob, Song Eun Seop, Kim Kong Jo, Park Young Ho, Ku Ja Hyeon
Department of Urology, Soonchunhyang School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Urol Res. 2007 Jun;35(3):139-42. doi: 10.1007/s00240-007-0091-7. Epub 2007 Apr 6.
The objective of this study was to investigate the usefulness and safety of midazolam-induced anesthesia for cystoscopy. From September 2005 to March 2006, 80 patients scheduled for regular outpatient follow-up cystoscopy participated in this study. The patients were randomized and classified according to the cystoscope type and midazolam use as follows: group 1 (10 men and 10 women), flexible cystoscopy + midazolam; group 2 (10 men and 10 women), flexible cystoscopy + no midazolam; group 3 (10 men and 10 women), rigid cystoscopy + midazolam; and group 4 (10 men and 10 women), rigid cystoscopy + no midazolam. Immediately after the procedure, the patients were asked to rate their comfort level using a ten-point visual linear analog self-assessment pain scale. The patients assigned in the midazolam group experienced no side-effects from the midazolam. Blood pressure and pulse rate did not change significantly during the procedure. The degree of pain experienced by group 1 was lower than other groups (P < 0.05) and group 4 had a significantly greater pain score than other groups (P < 0.05). No difference was evident between group 2 and 3 regarding the pain score. Midazolam anesthesia may relieve pain during rigid and flexible cystoscopy. Our findings suggest that midazolam anesthesia during cystoscopy is useful and safe.
本研究的目的是调查咪达唑仑诱导麻醉用于膀胱镜检查的有效性和安全性。2005年9月至2006年3月,80例计划进行常规门诊随访膀胱镜检查的患者参与了本研究。患者根据膀胱镜类型和咪达唑仑使用情况随机分组如下:第1组(10名男性和10名女性),软性膀胱镜检查+咪达唑仑;第2组(10名男性和10名女性),软性膀胱镜检查+不使用咪达唑仑;第3组(10名男性和10名女性),硬性膀胱镜检查+咪达唑仑;第4组(10名男性和10名女性),硬性膀胱镜检查+不使用咪达唑仑。检查结束后,立即要求患者使用10分视觉线性模拟自评疼痛量表对舒适度进行评分。咪达唑仑组患者未出现咪达唑仑的副作用。检查过程中血压和脉搏率无明显变化。第1组经历的疼痛程度低于其他组(P<0.05),第4组的疼痛评分明显高于其他组(P<0.05)。第2组和第3组在疼痛评分方面无明显差异。咪达唑仑麻醉可缓解硬性和软性膀胱镜检查期间的疼痛。我们的研究结果表明,膀胱镜检查期间使用咪达唑仑麻醉是有效且安全的。