Wolf Chris A, Wijdicks Eelco F M, Bamlet William R, McClelland Robyn L
Department of Nursing, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Mayo Clin Proc. 2007 Apr;82(4):435-8. doi: 10.4065/82.4.435.
The FOUR (Full Outline of UnResponsiveness) score is a new coma scale that consists of 4 components (eye, motor, brainstem, and respiration). The scale was recently validated, but variability among nursing staff has been documented.
We prospectively studied the FOUR score in 80 patients with acute neurologic disease in an intensive care unit (ICU) and compared it with the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) using 20 experienced and inexperienced neuroscience ICU nurses and nonneuroscience ICU nurses. Each nurse was trained with the use of video examples and instruction cards. Each patient was rated by 2 nurses, with the order randomly assigned.
The rater agreement was good to excellent with the FOUR score (weighted kappa: eye, 0.84; respiration, 0.92; brainstem, 0.89; and motor, 0.73) and similar to that for the GCS (weighted kappa: eye, 0.85; verbal, 0.89; and motor, 0.74). Greater average experience in years was associated with less disagreement, but the difference was not statistically significant.
The FOUR score provides more neurologic information than the GCS. The FOUR score can be used by any ICU nurses, even those with minimal experience.
FOUR(无反应性全面概述)评分是一种新的昏迷量表,由4个部分(眼睛、运动、脑干和呼吸)组成。该量表最近已得到验证,但护理人员之间存在评分差异的情况已有记录。
我们对重症监护病房(ICU)的80例急性神经系统疾病患者进行了前瞻性的FOUR评分研究,并让20名经验丰富和经验不足的神经科学ICU护士以及非神经科学ICU护士将其与格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)进行比较。每位护士通过视频示例和指导卡进行培训。每位患者由2名护士进行评分,评分顺序随机分配。
评估者对FOUR评分的一致性良好至优秀(加权kappa值:眼睛,0.84;呼吸,0.92;脑干,0.89;运动,0.73),与GCS评分的一致性相似(加权kappa值:眼睛,0.85;语言,0.89;运动,0.74)。平均工作年限越长,评分分歧越小,但差异无统计学意义。
FOUR评分比GCS能提供更多的神经学信息。任何ICU护士,即使是经验最少的护士,都可以使用FOUR评分。