Suppr超能文献

心血管磁共振成像对心外膜脂肪组织的容积评估

Volumetric assessment of epicardial adipose tissue with cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.

作者信息

Flüchter Stephan, Haghi Dariush, Dinter Dietmar, Heberlein Wolf, Kühl Harald P, Neff Wolfgang, Sueselbeck Tim, Borggrefe Martin, Papavassiliu Theano

机构信息

First Medical Department, University Hospital of Mannheim, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany.

出版信息

Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007 Apr;15(4):870-8. doi: 10.1038/oby.2007.591.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Previous studies determined the amount of epicardial fat by measuring the right ventricular epicardial fat thickness. However, it is not proven whether this one-dimensional method correlates well with the absolute amount of epicardial fat. In this prospective study, a new cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) method using the three-dimensional summation of slices method was introduced to assess the total amount of epicardial fat.

RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURES

CMR was performed in 43 patients with congestive heart failure and in 28 healthy controls. The absolute amount of epicardial fat was assessed volumetrically in consecutive short-axis views by means of the modified Simpson's rule. Additionally, the right ventricular epicardial fat thickness was measured in two different imaging planes: long-axis view (EFT-4CV) and consecutive short-axis views (EFT-SAX).

RESULTS

Using the volumetric approach, patients with congestive heart failure had less epicardial fat mass than controls (51 g vs. 65 g, p=0.01). This finding was supported by EFT-SAX (2.9 mm vs. 4.3 mm, p<0.0001) but not by EFT-4CV (3.5 mm vs. 3.8 mm, p=not significant). Epicardial fat mass correlated moderately with EFT-SAX in both groups (r=0.466, p=0.012 in controls and r=0.590, p<0.0001 in patients) and with EFT-4CV in controls (r=0.387, p=0.042). There were no significant differences between EFT-4CV and EFT-SAX in controls (4.3 mm vs. 3.8 mm, p=0.240). However, in the heart failure group, EFT-4CV was significantly higher compared with EFT-SAX (3.5 mm vs. 2.9 mm, p=0.003). Interobserver variability and reproducibility were superior for the volumetric approach compared with thickness measurements.

DISCUSSION

Quantitative assessment of epicardial fat mass using the CMR-based volumetric approach is feasible and yields superior reproducibility compared with conventional methods.

摘要

目的

以往研究通过测量右心室心外膜脂肪厚度来确定心外膜脂肪量。然而,这种一维方法是否与心外膜脂肪的绝对量具有良好的相关性尚未得到证实。在这项前瞻性研究中,引入了一种新的心血管磁共振成像(CMR)方法,即利用切片三维求和法来评估心外膜脂肪总量。

研究方法与步骤

对43例充血性心力衰竭患者和28例健康对照者进行CMR检查。通过改良的辛普森法则,在连续的短轴视图中对心外膜脂肪的绝对量进行容积评估。此外,在两个不同的成像平面上测量右心室心外膜脂肪厚度:长轴视图(EFT - 4CV)和连续短轴视图(EFT - SAX)。

结果

采用容积法,充血性心力衰竭患者的心外膜脂肪量低于对照组(51克对65克,p = 0.01)。这一发现得到了EFT - SAX的支持(2.9毫米对4.3毫米,p < 0.0001),但未得到EFT - 4CV的支持(3.5毫米对3.8毫米,p = 无显著性差异)。两组中心外膜脂肪量与EFT - SAX均呈中度相关(对照组中r = 0.466,p = 0.012;患者组中r = 0.590,p < 0.0001),与对照组中的EFT - 4CV呈相关(r = 0.387,p = 0.042)。对照组中EFT - 4CV与EFT - SAX之间无显著差异(4.3毫米对3.8毫米,p = 0.240)。然而,在心力衰竭组中,EFT - 4CV显著高于EFT - SAX(3.5毫米对2.9毫米,p = 0.003)。与厚度测量相比,容积法的观察者间变异性和可重复性更优。

讨论

与传统方法相比,基于CMR的容积法对心外膜脂肪量进行定量评估是可行的,且具有更高的可重复性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验