Immunodeficiency Service, Montreal Chest Institute, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Canada.
PLoS One. 2007 Apr 11;2(4):e367. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000367.
Oral fluid-based rapid tests are promising for improving HIV diagnosis and screening. However, recent reports from the United States of false-positive results with the oral OraQuick ADVANCE HIV1/2 test have raised concerns about their performance in routine practice. We report a field evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy, client preference, and feasibility for the oral fluid-based OraQuick Rapid HIV1/2 test in a rural hospital in India.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: A cross-sectional, hospital-based study was conducted in 450 consenting participants with suspected HIV infection in rural India. The objectives were to evaluate performance, client preference and feasibility of the OraQuick Rapid HIV-1/2 tests. Two Oraquick Rapid HIV1/2 tests (oral fluid and finger stick) were administered in parallel with confirmatory ELISA/Western Blot (reference standard). Pre- and post-test counseling and face to face interviews were conducted to determine client preference. Of the 450 participants, 146 were deemed to be HIV sero-positive using the reference standard (seropositivity rate of 32% (95% confidence interval [CI] 28%, 37%)). The OraQuick test on oral fluid specimens had better performance with a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 98, 100) and a specificity of 100% (95% CI 99, 100), as compared to the OraQuick test on finger stick specimens with a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 98, 100), and a specificity of 99.7% (95% CI 98.4, 99.9). The OraQuick oral fluid-based test was preferred by 87% of the participants for first time testing and 60% of the participants for repeat testing.
CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: In a rural Indian hospital setting, the OraQuick Rapid- HIV1/2 test was found to be highly accurate. The oral fluid-based test performed marginally better than the finger stick test. The oral OraQuick test was highly preferred by participants. In the context of global efforts to scale-up HIV testing, our data suggest that oral fluid-based rapid HIV testing may work well in rural, resource-limited settings.
基于口腔液的快速检测对于改善 HIV 诊断和筛查具有广阔前景。然而,最近美国有报道称口腔 OraQuick ADVANCE HIV1/2 检测出现假阳性结果,这引发了人们对其在常规实践中的性能的担忧。我们报告了在印度农村一家医院中,对基于口腔液的 OraQuick 快速 HIV1/2 检测的诊断准确性、患者偏好和可行性进行的现场评估。
方法/主要发现:在印度农村的一家医院中进行了一项横断面、基于医院的研究,纳入了 450 名疑似 HIV 感染的同意参与的患者。研究目的是评估 OraQuick 快速 HIV-1/2 检测的性能、患者偏好和可行性。两种 Oraquick 快速 HIV1/2 检测(口腔液和指尖采血)同时平行进行,以确证性 ELISA/Western Blot(参考标准)。进行了预检测和后检测咨询以及面对面访谈,以确定患者偏好。根据参考标准,450 名参与者中有 146 人被认为 HIV 血清阳性(血清阳性率为 32%(95%CI,28%,37%))。与 OraQuick 指尖采血标本检测相比,口腔液标本 OraQuick 检测的敏感性为 100%(95%CI,98,100),特异性为 100%(95%CI,99,100),表现更佳,而 OraQuick 指尖采血标本检测的敏感性为 100%(95%CI,98,100),特异性为 99.7%(95%CI,98.4,99.9)。对于首次检测,87%的参与者更喜欢 OraQuick 基于口腔液的检测,60%的参与者更喜欢重复检测。
结论/意义:在印度农村医院环境中,OraQuick 快速 HIV-1/2 检测被发现具有高度准确性。基于口腔液的检测略优于指尖采血检测。参与者非常喜欢口腔 OraQuick 检测。在全球扩大 HIV 检测的努力背景下,我们的数据表明,基于口腔液的快速 HIV 检测可能在资源有限的农村环境中效果良好。