Suppr超能文献

在腰椎手术中使用基于疾病控制与预防中心指南的抗菌药物预防措施有效预防手术部位感染。

Effective prevention of surgical site infection using a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guideline-based antimicrobial prophylaxis in lumbar spine surgery.

作者信息

Kanayama Masahiro, Hashimoto Tomoyuki, Shigenobu Keiichi, Oha Fumihiro, Togawa Daisuke

机构信息

Spine Center, Hakodate Central General Hospital, Hakodate, Hokkaido, Japan.

出版信息

J Neurosurg Spine. 2007 Apr;6(4):327-9. doi: 10.3171/spi.2007.6.4.7.

Abstract

OBJECT

Antimicrobial prophylaxis (AMP) reduces the rate of surgical site infection (SSI) in lumbar spine surgery, but a great deal of variation exists regarding the timing and duration of AMP. The authors had previously used prophylactic antibiotics for 5 to 7 postoperative days. Based on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guideline, the AMP period was changed to the day of surgery only. In the current study, the authors compared the rate of SSI in lumbar spine surgeries between two different protocols of AMP.

METHODS

Data from 1597 consecutive uninfected patients who had undergone lumbar spine surgery between January 1999 and September 2004 were reviewed. The pathophysiologies among these patients included disc herniation in 686, degenerative spondylolisthesis in 340, spinal stenosis in 259, failed lumbar surgeries in 73, degenerative scoliosis in 52, isthmic spondylolisthesis in 48, spinal trauma in 34, foraminal stenosis in 27, spinal tumor in 27, and miscellaneous in 51 patients. The rate of SSI was compared between the two AMP groups. There were 1133 patients in the multiple-dose group, and 464 patients in the single-dose group. The rate of instrumentation surgery was not statistically different between the multiple-dose group (43%) and the single-dose group (39%). The overall rate of SSI was 0.7%. The SSI rate was 0.8% in the multiple-dose group and 0.4% in the single-dose group; the difference between the two was not significant. Regarding the organisms of SSI, resistant strains of bacteria were cultured in five (83.3%) of six patients in the multiple-dose group, whereas none was cultured in the single-dose group.

CONCLUSIONS

Data in the current study did not demonstrate a difference in the rate of SSI between the two different AMP protocols. Based on the CDC guideline, a single dose of AMP was proven to be efficacious for the prevention of SSI in lumbar spine surgeries. A shorter duration of first-generation cephalosporin use may effectively prevent the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacterial infection.

摘要

目的

抗菌预防(AMP)可降低腰椎手术部位感染(SSI)的发生率,但在AMP的时机和持续时间方面存在很大差异。作者此前术后使用预防性抗生素5至7天。根据疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)的指南,AMP期改为仅手术当天使用。在本研究中,作者比较了两种不同AMP方案在腰椎手术中SSI的发生率。

方法

回顾了1999年1月至2004年9月期间连续1597例接受腰椎手术且未发生感染患者的数据。这些患者的病理生理情况包括椎间盘突出症686例、退行性椎体滑脱340例、椎管狭窄259例、腰椎手术失败73例、退行性脊柱侧弯52例、峡部裂性椎体滑脱48例、脊柱创伤34例、椎间孔狭窄27例、脊柱肿瘤27例以及其他情况51例。比较了两个AMP组的SSI发生率。多剂量组有1133例患者,单剂量组有464例患者。多剂量组(43%)和单剂量组(39%)的器械手术率在统计学上无差异。SSI的总体发生率为0.7%。多剂量组的SSI发生率为0.8%,单剂量组为0.4%;两组之间的差异不显著。关于SSI的病原体,多剂量组6例患者中有5例(83.3%)培养出耐药菌株,而单剂量组未培养出耐药菌株。

结论

本研究数据未显示两种不同AMP方案在SSI发生率上存在差异。根据CDC指南,单剂量AMP被证明对预防腰椎手术中的SSI有效。第一代头孢菌素使用时间较短可能有效预防耐药细菌感染的出现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验