Yüksel Hasan, Berardino Luigi, Yüksel Diydem, Yilmaz Ozge, Burak Zeynep
Celal Bayar University, Department of Pediatric Allergy and Pulmonology, Manisa, Turkey.
Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007 Feb;39(2):64-8.
Aerosol nebulization is and most effective ways of treating airway diseases especially in children. Failure of inhaled asthma treatment is mainly due to inadequate deposition of drugs in the peripheral area of the lungs. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of a traditional mask and that of a new spacer mouth-mask (Nebula, Markos Mefar, Italy) when used with a jet nebulizer, by measuring aerosol deposition in the lungs, oropharynx, upper airways, and gastrointestinal tract. Twelve children without respiratory disease aged between 8 and 13 years were included in the study. Aerosol inhalation was performed using a jet nebulizer with 2 mL of saline solution containing 20 Mci of Tc99m-DTPA. The first group initially performed aerosol inhalation using a traditional facemask and then, one week later, using the new spacer mouth-mask. The second group performed aerosol inhalation using the new spacer mouth-mask first and then, one week later, using a traditional mask. Scintigraphic ventilation images were then obtained, and aerosol deposition in the trachea, oropharynx, lungs and stomach was measured. In the first group, the radioaerosol deposition in the peripheral lung area using the new spacer mouth-mask was greater 97.8 +/- 7.0 vs. 68.5 +/- 7.9 (p = 0.04). On the other hand, the oropharyngeal radioaerosol deposition was greater using the traditional mask: 50.2 +/- 5.2 vs 20.3 +/- 11.8 (p = 0.028). Similarly, in the second group the peripheral lung deposition was greater and the oropharyngeal deposition was less using the new spacer mouth-mask: 97.3 +/- 9.4 vs. 70.2 +/- 11.2 and 20.7 +/- 8.9 vs. 46.3 +/- 16.8 (p = 0.028 and 0.046 respectively). In conclusion, the new design of the spacer mouth-mask allows greater aerosol deposition in the peripheral lung area and less in other parts such as the oropharyngeal area, the central airways and the stomach.
雾化吸入是治疗气道疾病尤其是儿童气道疾病最有效的方法之一。吸入性哮喘治疗失败主要是由于药物在肺外周区域的沉积不足。本研究的目的是通过测量肺、口咽、上呼吸道和胃肠道中的气溶胶沉积,比较传统面罩与新型储雾罐面罩(Nebula,Markos Mefar,意大利)与喷射雾化器配合使用时的疗效。12名年龄在8至13岁之间无呼吸系统疾病的儿童被纳入研究。使用含有20毫居里Tc99m-DTPA的2毫升盐溶液通过喷射雾化器进行气溶胶吸入。第一组最初使用传统面罩进行气溶胶吸入,然后在一周后使用新型储雾罐面罩。第二组首先使用新型储雾罐面罩进行气溶胶吸入,然后在一周后使用传统面罩。然后获得闪烁通气图像,并测量气管、口咽、肺和胃中的气溶胶沉积。在第一组中,使用新型储雾罐面罩时外周肺区域的放射性气溶胶沉积更大:97.8±7.0 对比 68.5±7.9(p = 0.04)。另一方面,使用传统面罩时口咽放射性气溶胶沉积更大:50.2±5.2 对比 20.3±11.8(p = 0.028)。同样,在第二组中,使用新型储雾罐面罩时外周肺沉积更大而口咽沉积更少:97.3±9.4 对比 70.2±11.2 以及 20.7±8.9 对比 46.3±16.8(分别为 p = 0.028 和 0.046)。总之,新型储雾罐面罩设计能使更多气溶胶沉积在外周肺区域,而在口咽区域、中央气道和胃等其他部位沉积更少。