Maillou P, Cadden S W
Unit of Restorative Dental Care and Clinical Dental Sciences, The Dental School, University of Dundee, Park Place, Dundee, UK.
J Oral Rehabil. 2007 May;34(5):329-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01723.x.
Electromyography was used to compare characteristics of an inhibitory jaw reflex in 10 temporomandibular disorder patients and 10 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. The methodology was novel in that the reflex was that evoked in the active masseter muscle, by electrical stimulation of perioral skin. This response has advantages over those previously studied as it avoids problems associated with stimulating in the moist intra-oral environment and it is monophasic, thus permitting easy quantification. The results have shown that (i) with the stimulation parameters employed, the reflex was present in all 10 control subjects, but in only eight of 10 temporomandibular disorder patients. (ii) When stimulation intensities were expressed as multiples of sensory threshold, there was no significant difference in the minimum level of stimulation required to evoke the reflex between the groups, although there was a trend for the patients with temporomandibular disorders to require higher intensities. (iii) Comparison of data from subjects giving responses at the same stimulus intensity (6 x sensory threshold: seven temporomandibular disorder patients, eight controls), showed no significant differences in the latencies or magnitudes of the reflex between the groups. However, the overall duration of the reflex was significantly shorter for the patients with temporomandibular disorders, with the reflex finishing significantly earlier. Thus even within the limitations of this study, it appears that an inhibitory jaw reflex evoked from stimulation around the mouth, may be weaker in temporomandibular disorder patients. This conclusion is consistent with previous studies on more complex jaw reflexes evoked by intra-oral stimuli.
采用肌电图来比较10名颞下颌关节紊乱症患者与10名年龄和性别匹配的健康对照者的抑制性下颌反射特征。该方法具有创新性,因为该反射是通过电刺激口周皮肤在活动的咬肌中诱发的。这种反应比先前研究的反应具有优势,因为它避免了与在潮湿的口腔内环境中进行刺激相关的问题,并且它是单相的,因此便于量化。结果表明:(i)在所采用的刺激参数下,10名对照受试者均出现了该反射,但10名颞下颌关节紊乱症患者中只有8名出现了该反射。(ii)当刺激强度表示为感觉阈值的倍数时,两组之间诱发该反射所需的最小刺激水平没有显著差异,尽管颞下颌关节紊乱症患者有需要更高强度刺激的趋势。(iii)对在相同刺激强度(6倍感觉阈值:7名颞下颌关节紊乱症患者,8名对照者)下做出反应的受试者的数据进行比较,结果显示两组之间反射的潜伏期或幅度没有显著差异。然而,颞下颌关节紊乱症患者的反射总持续时间明显较短,反射结束明显更早。因此,即使在本研究的局限性范围内,似乎从口周刺激诱发的抑制性下颌反射在颞下颌关节紊乱症患者中可能较弱。这一结论与先前关于由口腔内刺激诱发的更复杂下颌反射的研究一致。