Suppr超能文献

根据熟悉度、回忆及回忆信息量对识别记忆的神经关联进行解离。

Dissociation of the neural correlates of recognition memory according to familiarity, recollection, and amount of recollected information.

作者信息

Vilberg Kaia L, Rugg Michael D

机构信息

Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, and Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-3800, USA.

出版信息

Neuropsychologia. 2007 Jun 11;45(10):2216-25. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.02.027. Epub 2007 Mar 12.

Abstract

The present experiment used fMRI to investigate whether neural correlates of recognition memory behave in a manner consistent with the proposal that recognition decisions are based on a unidimensional memory strength variable. A modified Remember/Know recognition test was used in which participants could indicate two levels of recollection. Participants were required to indicate whether a test item was new, familiar (known), elicited recollection of general contextual details from the study episode (R1 response), or elicited a specific recollection of the item with which it was paired at study (R2 response). Little evidence could be found to support the view that Remember/Know/New judgments reflect variations along a single strength dimension. Instead, the findings replicated prior research in indicating that the neural correlates of recollection and familiarity can be doubly dissociated. Two recollection-sensitive regions - left lateral inferior parietal and left fusiform cortex - were found to be sensitive to amount of information recollected, as operationalized in the contrast between R2 and R1 responses. It is proposed that these regions may support the representation of recollected information.

摘要

本实验使用功能磁共振成像(fMRI)来研究识别记忆的神经关联是否以一种与识别决策基于单维记忆强度变量这一观点相一致的方式表现。采用了一种改良的记住/知道识别测试,参与者可以表明两种回忆水平。要求参与者指出一个测试项目是新的、熟悉的(已知的)、引发了对学习情节中一般背景细节的回忆(R1反应),还是引发了对其在学习时配对项目的特定回忆(R2反应)。几乎没有证据支持记住/知道/新判断反映沿单一强度维度变化的观点。相反,研究结果重复了先前的研究,表明回忆和熟悉度的神经关联可以双重分离。发现两个对回忆敏感的区域——左侧下顶叶和左侧梭状回——对回忆的信息量敏感,这在R2和R1反应的对比中得以体现。有人提出,这些区域可能支持对回忆信息的表征。

相似文献

1
Dissociation of the neural correlates of recognition memory according to familiarity, recollection, and amount of recollected information.
Neuropsychologia. 2007 Jun 11;45(10):2216-25. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.02.027. Epub 2007 Mar 12.
3
Effects of modality on the neural correlates of encoding processes supporting recollection and familiarity.
Learn Mem. 2011 Aug 18;18(9):565-73. doi: 10.1101/lm.2197211. Print 2011 Sep.
4
The hippocampus supports both recollection and familiarity when memories are strong.
J Neurosci. 2011 Nov 2;31(44):15693-702. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3438-11.2011.
5
Decoding the content of recollection within the core recollection network and beyond.
Cortex. 2017 Jun;91:101-113. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.12.011. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
6
Emotional valence influences the neural correlates associated with remembering and knowing.
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2008 Jun;8(2):143-52. doi: 10.3758/cabn.8.2.143.
8
Reinstatement of encoding context during recollection: behavioural and neuroimaging evidence of a double dissociation.
Behav Brain Res. 2014 May 1;264:51-63. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.01.033. Epub 2014 Feb 1.
9
Recollection and familiarity make independent contributions to memory judgments.
J Neurosci. 2012 May 23;32(21):7253-7. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6396-11.2012.
10
Recollection can be weak and familiarity can be strong.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 Mar;38(2):325-39. doi: 10.1037/a0025483. Epub 2011 Oct 3.

引用本文的文献

2
Neural signatures of recollection are sensitive to memory quality and specific event features.
bioRxiv. 2025 Mar 18:2025.03.18.643924. doi: 10.1101/2025.03.18.643924.
3
Opposing effects of pre-encoding stress on neural substrates of item and emotional contextual source memory retrieval.
Neurobiol Stress. 2024 Nov 14;33:100691. doi: 10.1016/j.ynstr.2024.100691. eCollection 2024 Nov.
4
7
Representational dynamics of memories for real-life events.
iScience. 2022 Oct 17;25(11):105391. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105391. eCollection 2022 Nov 18.
8
Humulus japonicus attenuates LPS-and scopolamine-induced cognitive impairment in mice.
Lab Anim Res. 2022 Jul 19;38(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s42826-022-00134-3.
9
Sensitivity of the hippocampus to objective but not subjective episodic memory judgments.
Cogn Neurosci. 2022 Jul;13(3-4):165-170. doi: 10.1080/17588928.2022.2033713. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
10
Effects of emotional study context on immediate and delayed recognition memory: Evidence from event-related potentials.
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2022 Feb;22(1):57-74. doi: 10.3758/s13415-021-00944-3. Epub 2021 Sep 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory.
Psychol Rev. 2007 Jan;114(1):152-76. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.1.152.
2
The relationship between electrophysiological correlates of recollection and amount of information retrieved.
Brain Res. 2006 Nov 29;1122(1):161-70. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.09.023. Epub 2006 Oct 6.
3
Coherent spontaneous activity identifies a hippocampal-parietal memory network.
J Neurophysiol. 2006 Dec;96(6):3517-31. doi: 10.1152/jn.00048.2006. Epub 2006 Aug 9.
4
Electrophysiological dissociation of the neural correlates of recollection and familiarity.
Brain Res. 2006 Jul 19;1100(1):125-35. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.05.019. Epub 2006 Jun 13.
5
The neural system that mediates familiarity memory.
Hippocampus. 2006;16(5):504-20. doi: 10.1002/hipo.20178.
6
The remember response: subject to bias, graded, and not a process-pure indicator of recollection.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Oct;12(5):865-73. doi: 10.3758/bf03196778.
7
Visuospatial reorienting signals in the human temporo-parietal junction are independent of response selection.
Eur J Neurosci. 2006 Jan;23(2):591-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04573.x.
8
A Population-Average, Landmark- and Surface-based (PALS) atlas of human cerebral cortex.
Neuroimage. 2005 Nov 15;28(3):635-62. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.06.058. Epub 2005 Sep 19.
10
Further dissociating the processes involved in recognition memory: an FMRI study.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 Jul;17(7):1058-73. doi: 10.1162/0898929054475208.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验