Thurston Virginia Carol, Wales Paula Sue, Bell Mary Alice, Torbeck Laura, Brokaw James Joseph
Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, USA.
Acad Med. 2007 May;82(5):441-5. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31803e86c5.
Relatively little is known about how medical genetics is being taught in the undergraduate medical curriculum and whether educators concur regarding topical priority. This study sought to document the current state of medical genetics education in U.S. and Canadian accredited medical schools.
In August 2004, surveys were sent from the Indiana University School of Medicine to 149 U.S. and Canadian medical genetics course directors or curricular deans. Returned surveys were collected through June 2005. Participants were asked about material covered, number of contact hours, year in which the course was offered, and what department sponsored the course. Data were collated according to instructional method and course content.
The response rate was 75.2%. Most respondents (77%) taught medical genetics in the first year of medical school; only half (47%) reported that medical genetics was incorporated into the third and fourth years. About two thirds of respondents (62%) devoted 20 to 40 hours to medical genetics instruction, which was largely concerned with general concepts (86%) rather than practical application (11%). Forty-six percent of respondents reported teaching a stand-alone course versus 54% who integrated medical genetics into another course. Topics most commonly taught were cancer genetics (94.2%), multifactorial inheritance (91.3%), Mendelian disorders (90.3%), clinical cytogenetics (89.3%), and patterns of inheritance (87.4%).
The findings provide important baseline data relative to guidelines recently established by the Association of American Medical Colleges. Ultimately, improved genetics curricula will help train physicians who are knowledgeable and comfortable discussing and answering questions about genetics with their patients.
对于医学遗传学在本科医学课程中的教学方式以及教育工作者在主题优先级上是否达成共识,我们了解得相对较少。本研究旨在记录美国和加拿大经认可的医学院校中医学遗传学教育的现状。
2004年8月,印第安纳大学医学院向149位美国和加拿大医学遗传学课程主任或课程院长发送了调查问卷。截至2005年6月收集了回复的调查问卷。参与者被问及所涵盖的材料、接触时长、课程开设年份以及哪个部门主办了该课程。数据根据教学方法和课程内容进行了整理。
回复率为75.2%。大多数受访者(77%)在医学院的第一年教授医学遗传学;只有一半(47%)的人报告说医学遗传学被纳入了第三年和第四年的课程。约三分之二的受访者(62%)将20至40小时用于医学遗传学教学,教学内容主要涉及一般概念(86%)而非实际应用(11%)。46%的受访者报告教授一门独立课程,而54%的人将医学遗传学融入另一门课程。最常讲授的主题是癌症遗传学(94.2%)、多因素遗传(91.3%)、孟德尔疾病(90.3%)、临床细胞遗传学(89.3%)和遗传模式(87.4%)。
这些发现提供了与美国医学院协会最近制定的指南相关的重要基础数据。最终,改进遗传学课程将有助于培养出有知识且能够自如地与患者讨论和回答有关遗传学问题的医生。