Benatar Michael, Kaminski Henry J
Department of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, OH, USA.
Neurology. 2007 Jun 12;68(24):2144-9. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000263481.14289.90. Epub 2007 Apr 25.
To perform a systematic review of the relevant literature and to provide evidence-based guidelines for the medical treatment of ocular myasthenia.
Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Register were searched for articles of possible relevance to the medical treatment of ocular myasthenia. The titles and abstracts of all articles, as well as the full texts of all potentially relevant manuscripts, were read by both reviewers. Experts in the field were also contacted to identify other published or unpublished literature. All articles were evaluated using predefined criteria to evaluate their methodologic quality. Data from these articles were extracted to address two questions: 1) Are there any effective treatments for symptoms of ocular myasthenia? 2) Are there any treatments that reduce the risk of progression from ocular to generalized myasthenia gravis (MG)?
A single randomized controlled trial compared the efficacy of intranasal neostigmine to placebo for the treatment of ocular symptoms. Methodologic limitations of this study preclude any firm conclusions. A second randomized controlled trial compared the efficacy of corticotropin with placebo, but outcome was reported in terms of a quantification of the range of eye movements. For this reason, the results of the second study could not be used to address the issues of improvement in ocular symptoms or the risk of progression to generalized MG. This review did not identify any randomized controlled trials addressing the risk of progression to generalized MG but did identify five observational studies reporting the effects of corticosteroids on progression to generalized MG, two of which also reported the effects of azathioprine.
The absence of high-quality evidence means that it is not possible to make any evidence-based recommendations regarding the effects of cholinesterase inhibitors, corticosteroids, or other immunosuppressive agents with respect to improvement of ocular symptoms. There is similarly an absence of evidence regarding the effects of cholinesterase inhibitors on the risk of progression to generalized myasthenia gravis (MG). Based on data from several observational studies, corticosteroids and azathioprine are of uncertain benefit in terms of their effect on the risk of progression to generalized MG.
对相关文献进行系统综述,并为眼肌型重症肌无力的药物治疗提供循证指南。
检索Medline、EMBASE和Cochrane神经肌肉疾病组登记册,查找可能与眼肌型重症肌无力药物治疗相关的文章。两位评审员阅读了所有文章的标题和摘要,以及所有潜在相关手稿的全文。还联系了该领域的专家,以确定其他已发表或未发表的文献。所有文章均使用预先定义的标准进行评估,以评价其方法学质量。从这些文章中提取数据,以回答两个问题:1)是否有任何有效治疗眼肌型重症肌无力症状的方法?2)是否有任何治疗方法可降低眼肌型重症肌无力进展为全身型重症肌无力(MG)的风险?
一项单一的随机对照试验比较了鼻内新斯的明与安慰剂治疗眼部症状的疗效。该研究的方法学局限性排除了得出任何确凿结论的可能性。第二项随机对照试验比较了促肾上腺皮质激素与安慰剂的疗效,但结果是以眼球运动范围的量化来报告的。因此,第二项研究的结果不能用于解决眼部症状改善问题或进展为全身型MG的风险问题。本综述未发现任何针对进展为全身型MG风险的随机对照试验,但确实发现了五项观察性研究报告了皮质类固醇对进展为全身型MG的影响,其中两项还报告了硫唑嘌呤的影响。
缺乏高质量证据意味着无法就胆碱酯酶抑制剂、皮质类固醇或其他免疫抑制剂对改善眼部症状的影响提出任何循证建议。同样缺乏关于胆碱酯酶抑制剂对进展为全身型重症肌无力(MG)风险影响的证据。根据多项观察性研究的数据,皮质类固醇和硫唑嘌呤对进展为全身型MG风险的影响益处尚不确定。