Engmann Lawrence, DiLuigi Andrea, Schmidt David, Nulsen John, Maier Donald, Benadiva Claudio
Center for Advanced Reproductive Services, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dowling South Building, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut 06030-6224, USA.
Fertil Steril. 2008 Jan;89(1):84-91. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.02.002. Epub 2007 Apr 26.
To determine whether there are any differences in the incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and implantation rates in high-risk patients undergoing IVF using a protocol consisting of GnRH agonist trigger after cotreatment with GnRH antagonist or hCG trigger after dual pituitary suppression protocol.
Prospective randomized controlled trial.
University-based tertiary fertility center.
PATIENT(S): Sixty-six patients under 40 years of age with polycystic ovarian syndrome, polycystic ovarian morphology, or previous high response undergoing IVF.
INTERVENTION(S): Patients were randomized to an ovarian stimulation protocol consisting of either GnRH agonist trigger after cotreatment with GnRH antagonist (study group) or hCG trigger after dual pituitary suppression with a GnRH agonist (control group). Both groups received luteal phase and early pregnancy supplementation with IM progesterone (P), and patients in the study group also received E(2) patches and their doses were adjusted according to the serum levels.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Incidence of OHSS and implantation rate.
RESULT(S): None of the patients in the study group developed any form of OHSS compared with 31% (10/32) of the patients in the control group. There were no significant differences in the implantation (22/61 [36.0%] vs. 20/64 [31.0%]), clinical pregnancy (17/30 [56.7%] vs. 15/29 [51.7%]), and ongoing pregnancy rates (16/30 [53.3%] vs. 14/29 [48.3%]) between the study and control groups, respectively.
CONCLUSION(S): The use of a protocol consisting of GnRH agonist trigger after GnRH antagonist cotreatment combined with adequate luteal phase and early pregnancy E(2) and P supplementation reduces the risk of OHSS in high-risk patients undergoing IVF without affecting implantation rate.
确定在接受体外受精(IVF)的高危患者中,使用促性腺激素释放激素(GnRH)拮抗剂协同治疗后GnRH激动剂触发方案或双重垂体抑制方案后hCG触发方案,卵巢过度刺激综合征(OHSS)的发生率和着床率是否存在差异。
前瞻性随机对照试验。
大学附属三级生殖中心。
66例年龄在40岁以下、患有多囊卵巢综合征、多囊卵巢形态或既往有高反应的接受IVF的患者。
患者被随机分为两种卵巢刺激方案,一种是GnRH拮抗剂协同治疗后GnRH激动剂触发方案(研究组),另一种是GnRH激动剂双重垂体抑制后hCG触发方案(对照组)。两组均在黄体期和孕早期补充肌内注射黄体酮(P),研究组患者还接受雌二醇(E₂)贴片治疗,其剂量根据血清水平进行调整。
OHSS的发生率和着床率。
研究组患者均未发生任何形式的OHSS,而对照组有31%(10/32)的患者发生。研究组和对照组在着床率(22/61 [36.0%] 对 20/64 [31.0%])、临床妊娠率(17/30 [5