Range Friederike, Viranyi Zsófia, Huber Ludwig
Department for Neurobiology and Cognition Research, University of Vienna, Vienna 1091, Austria.
Curr Biol. 2007 May 15;17(10):868-72. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.04.026. Epub 2007 Apr 26.
The transmission of cultural knowledge requires learners to identify what relevant information to retain and selectively imitate when observing others' skills. Young human infants--without relying on language or theory of mind--already show evidence of this ability. If, for example, in a communicative context, a model demonstrates a head action instead of a more efficient hand action, infants imitate the head action only if the demonstrator had no good reason to do so, suggesting that their imitation is a selective, interpretative process [1]. Early sensitivity to ostensive-communicative cues and to the efficiency of goal-directed actions is thought to be a crucial prerequisite for such relevance-guided selective imitation [2]. Although this competence is thought to be human specific [2], here we show an analog capacity in the dog. In our experiment, subjects watched a demonstrator dog pulling a rod with the paw instead of the preferred mouth action. In the first group, using the "inefficient" action was justified by the model's carrying of a ball in her mouth, whereas in the second group, no constraints could explain the demonstrator's choice. In the first trial after observation, dogs imitated the nonpreferred action only in the second group. Consequently, dogs, like children, demonstrated inferential selective imitation.
文化知识的传播要求学习者在观察他人技能时,识别出需要保留的相关信息并进行选择性模仿。年幼的人类婴儿——无需依赖语言或心理理论——就已经表现出了这种能力的证据。例如,在一个交流情境中,如果示范者展示的是头部动作而非更高效的手部动作,那么只有当示范者没有充分理由这样做时,婴儿才会模仿头部动作,这表明他们的模仿是一个选择性的、解释性的过程[1]。对明示性交流线索和目标导向动作效率的早期敏感性被认为是这种相关性引导的选择性模仿的关键前提[2]。尽管这种能力被认为是人类特有的[2],但我们在此展示了狗也具有类似的能力。在我们的实验中,受试狗看到一只示范狗用爪子而不是用更常用的嘴部动作去拉一根杆子。在第一组中,示范狗嘴里叼着一个球,所以使用“低效”动作是合理的;而在第二组中,没有任何限制因素可以解释示范者的选择。在观察后的第一次试验中,狗只在第二组中模仿了非首选动作。因此,狗和儿童一样,表现出了推理选择性模仿。