Ludvig Elliot A, Conover Kent, Shizgal Peter
Department of Computing Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2007 Mar;87(2):201-18. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2007.38-06.
The relation between reinforcer magnitude and timing behavior was studied using a peak procedure. Four rats received multiple consecutive sessions with both low and high levels of brain stimulation reward (BSR). Rats paused longer and had later start times during sessions when their responses were reinforced with low-magnitude BSR. When estimated by a symmetric Gaussian function, peak times also were earlier; when estimated by a better-fitting asymmetric Gaussian function or by analyzing individual trials, however, these peak-time changes were determined to reflect a mixture of large effects of BSR on start times and no effect on stop times. These results pose a significant dilemma for three major theories of timing (SET, MTS, and BeT), which all predict no effects for chronic manipulations of reinforcer magnitude. We conclude that increased reinforcer magnitude influences timing in two ways: through larger immediate after-effects that delay responding and through anticipatory effects that elicit earlier responding.
使用峰值程序研究了强化物强度与定时行为之间的关系。四只大鼠接受了多个连续的实验环节,其中既有低水平也有高水平的脑刺激奖励(BSR)。当大鼠的反应以低强度BSR强化时,它们在实验环节中停顿时间更长且开始时间更晚。通过对称高斯函数估计时,峰值时间也更早;然而,通过更合适的不对称高斯函数估计或分析单个试验时,这些峰值时间变化被确定为反映了BSR对开始时间的大影响和对停止时间无影响的混合情况。这些结果给三种主要的定时理论(SET、MTS和BeT)带来了重大困境,这三种理论都预测强化物强度的慢性操纵没有影响。我们得出结论,强化物强度增加通过两种方式影响定时:通过更大的即时后效来延迟反应,以及通过预期效应来引发更早的反应。