Tarantola D, Macklin R, Reed Z H, Kieny M P, Osmanov S, Stobie M, Hankins C
The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Vaccine. 2007 Jun 21;25(26):4863-74. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.03.022. Epub 2007 Mar 30.
Ethical principles of beneficence and justice combined with international human rights norms and standards create certain obligations on researchers, sponsors and public health authorities. These include treatment provision for participants enrolled in clinical trials of vaccines, drugs and other new preventive and curative technologies and methods. However, these obligations are poorly defined in practical terms, inconsistently understood or inadequately applied. Vaccine clinical trial designs normally define standards of prevention applicable to the population where the trial is to take place. The present document addresses specifically the setting of standards applicable to care and treatment in vaccine trials. The lack of clear guidance on how to achieve the optimal synergy between the development of new health technologies, on the one hand, and the promotion and protection of ethical and human rights principles, on the other, is a barrier to the progress of health research and therefore to the advancement of public health. The World Health Organization and UNAIDS have engaged in a series of consultations in Africa, the Americas, Asia and Europe to reflect on how this aim could best be achieved. This document highlights the outcome of these consultations. It proposes a structured approach to consensual decision making in the context of the clinical trial of vaccines against such public health challenges as HIV and newly emerging or threatening epidemics. A structured approach involving investigators and sponsors in a consultative process with trial communities and other stakeholders in research will ensure that the needs and legitimate expectations of trial participants are appropriately met, obligations towards them are delivered and, as a result, ethical research is facilitated in the interest of public health.
善行和正义的伦理原则与国际人权规范和标准相结合,给研究人员、资助者和公共卫生当局带来了某些义务。这些义务包括为参与疫苗、药物及其他新的预防和治疗技术与方法临床试验的参与者提供治疗。然而,这些义务在实际层面上界定不清、理解不一或应用不足。疫苗临床试验设计通常会确定适用于试验开展地区人群的预防标准。本文件专门论述适用于疫苗试验中护理和治疗的标准设定。一方面,在新卫生技术开发与另一方面的伦理和人权原则的促进与保护之间,缺乏关于如何实现最佳协同作用的明确指导,这是健康研究进展的障碍,因此也是公共卫生进步的障碍。世界卫生组织和联合国艾滋病规划署在非洲、美洲、亚洲和欧洲开展了一系列磋商,以思考如何能最好地实现这一目标。本文件突出了这些磋商的成果。它针对针对艾滋病毒以及新出现或有威胁的流行病等公共卫生挑战的疫苗临床试验,提出了一种达成共识决策的结构化方法。让研究人员和资助者参与与试验社区及研究中的其他利益攸关方的协商过程的结构化方法,将确保试验参与者的需求和合理期望得到适当满足,对他们的义务得以履行,从而促进符合公共卫生利益的伦理研究。