Suppr超能文献

局部应用抗生素预防手术伤口感染。一项体内研究。

Locally administered antibiotics for prophylaxis against surgical wound infection. An in vivo study.

作者信息

Yarboro Seth R, Baum Elyse J, Dahners Laurence E

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CB 7055, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7055, USA.

出版信息

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 May;89(5):929-33. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00919.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Currently, the standard for prophylaxis against surgical infection consists of perioperative systemic antibiotics. In this study, we investigated the relative efficacy of various methods of antibiotic delivery for the prevention of surgical wound infections. We hypothesized that sustained release of local antibiotics inside the wound cavity by a drug delivery system would be more effective than systemically administered antibiotics.

METHODS

Using a rat model, we inoculated a surgical wound in the quadriceps muscle with 8.0 x 10(5) colony-forming units of Staphylococcus aureus and then administered one of seven types of treatment: no treatment (control), bacitracin irrigation, calcium sulfate flakes, systemic gentamicin, local aqueous gentamicin, local gentamicin-loaded calcium sulfate flakes, and a combination of local gentamicin-loaded calcium sulfate and systemic gentamicin. The seven treatment groups consisted of ten rats each. To further evaluate a trend, the group treated with systemic gentamicin and the one treated with local gentamicin solution were extended to include twenty-five and twenty-seven rats, respectively. At forty-eight hours postoperatively, specimens from the wounds were obtained for quantitative culture.

RESULTS

The control group, the group treated with bacitracin irrigation, and the one treated with plain calcium sulfate had very high bacterial counts and high mortality rates while the groups treated with gentamicin had low bacterial counts and a 100% survival rate. Local gentamicin was significantly more effective than systemic gentamicin in reducing bacterial counts.

CONCLUSIONS

The gentamicin-loaded calcium sulfate flakes did not result in bacterial counts that were significantly lower than those following systemic administration of gentamicin, which refuted our hypothesis. However, gentamicin solution injected directly into the closed wound did result in levels of bacteria that were significantly lower than those following treatment with the systemic gentamicin.

摘要

背景

目前,外科感染的预防标准包括围手术期全身使用抗生素。在本研究中,我们调查了各种抗生素给药方法预防手术伤口感染的相对疗效。我们假设通过药物递送系统在伤口腔内持续释放局部抗生素比全身使用抗生素更有效。

方法

使用大鼠模型,我们在股四头肌的手术伤口中接种8.0×10⁵个金黄色葡萄球菌菌落形成单位,然后给予七种治疗方法之一:不治疗(对照)、杆菌肽冲洗、硫酸钙薄片、全身庆大霉素、局部庆大霉素水溶液、局部载庆大霉素硫酸钙薄片,以及局部载庆大霉素硫酸钙与全身庆大霉素联合使用。七个治疗组每组由十只大鼠组成。为了进一步评估趋势,全身使用庆大霉素治疗组和局部使用庆大霉素溶液治疗组分别扩展至包括二十五只和二十七只大鼠。术后48小时,从伤口获取标本进行定量培养。

结果

对照组、杆菌肽冲洗治疗组和普通硫酸钙治疗组细菌计数非常高且死亡率高,而庆大霉素治疗组细菌计数低且存活率为100%。局部使用庆大霉素在减少细菌计数方面明显比全身使用庆大霉素更有效。

结论

载庆大霉素硫酸钙薄片导致的细菌计数并不显著低于全身使用庆大霉素后的细菌计数,这反驳了我们的假设。然而,直接注入闭合伤口的庆大霉素溶液导致的细菌水平明显低于全身使用庆大霉素治疗后的细菌水平。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验