Dyckman Kara A, Camchong Jazmin, Clementz Brett A, McDowell Jennifer E
Department of Psychology, BioImaging Research Center, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602-3013, USA.
Neuroimage. 2007 Jul 1;36(3):774-84. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.03.023. Epub 2007 Mar 28.
The present study evaluated the effect of context on behavior and brain activity during saccade tasks. FMRI and eye movement data were collected while 36 participants completed three runs in a block design: (1) fixation alternating with pro-saccades, (2) fixation alternating with anti-saccades, and (3) pro- alternating with anti-saccades. Two task-related data-driven regressors, identified using independent component analysis, were used in GLM analyses. Brain activity associated with anti- and pro-saccades were compared under both single (runs 1 and 2) and mixed saccade (run 3) conditions. Brain areas consistently associated with anti-saccades in previous studies, including striatum, thalamus, cuneus, precuneus, lateral and medial frontal eye fields (FEF), supplementary eye fields (SEF), and prefrontal cortex (PFC) showed significantly greater percent signal change during the fixation/anti- compared with the fixation/pro-saccade run. During the pro/anti run, however, only precuneus, SEF and FEF showed greater activation during the anti-saccade trials. This is a clear demonstration that the saccade-related neural circuitry is affected by context. Behavioral results suggest that performance on saccade tasks is also affected by context. Participants made more direction errors on pro-trials that followed anti-trials than on pro-trials that followed fixation. Results from this study indicate that precuneus, SEF and FEF, which showed anti-saccade-related activity during both comparisons, may be more important for supporting this complex behavioral response. Other brain regions, such as PFC, however, which showed anti-saccade-related activity during only the single task comparison, may be more involved in response selection and/or context updating.
本研究评估了上下文对扫视任务期间行为和大脑活动的影响。在36名参与者按照组块设计完成三轮实验的过程中,收集了功能磁共振成像(fMRI)和眼动数据:(1)注视与顺向扫视交替,(2)注视与逆向扫视交替,以及(3)顺向扫视与逆向扫视交替。在一般线性模型(GLM)分析中使用了两个通过独立成分分析确定的与任务相关的数据驱动回归因子。在单任务(实验1和2)和顺逆扫视混合任务(实验3)条件下,比较了与逆向和顺向扫视相关的大脑活动。在之前的研究中一直与逆向扫视相关的脑区,包括纹状体、丘脑、楔叶、楔前叶、额叶眼动区(FEF)的外侧和内侧、辅助眼区(SEF)以及前额叶皮质(PFC),与注视/逆向扫视实验相比,在注视/顺向扫视实验期间显示出显著更大的信号变化百分比。然而,在顺向/逆向扫视实验中,只有楔前叶、SEF和FEF在逆向扫视试验期间表现出更强的激活。这清楚地表明与扫视相关的神经回路受上下文影响。行为结果表明扫视任务的表现也受上下文影响。与注视后的顺向试验相比,参与者在逆向试验后的顺向试验中出现了更多的方向错误。本研究结果表明,在两次比较中均显示出与逆向扫视相关活动的楔前叶、SEF和FEF,可能对支持这种复杂的行为反应更为重要。然而,其他脑区,如PFC,仅在单任务比较期间显示出与逆向扫视相关的活动,可能更多地参与反应选择和/或上下文更新。