Zeng Qing T, Tse Tony, Divita Guy, Keselman Alla, Crowell Jon, Browne Allen C, Goryachev Sergey, Ngo Long
Harvard Medical School, Decision Systems Group, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
J Med Internet Res. 2007 Feb 28;9(1):e4. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9.1.e4.
The development of consumer health information applications such as health education websites has motivated the research on consumer health vocabulary (CHV). Term identification is a critical task in vocabulary development. Because of the heterogeneity and ambiguity of consumer expressions, term identification for CHV is more challenging than for professional health vocabularies.
For the development of a CHV, we explored several term identification methods, including collaborative human review and automated term recognition methods.
A set of criteria was established to ensure consistency in the collaborative review, which analyzed 1893 strings. Using the results from the human review, we tested two automated methods-C-value formula and a logistic regression model.
The study identified 753 consumer terms and found the logistic regression model to be highly effective for CHV term identification (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 95.5%).
The collaborative human review and logistic regression methods were effective for identifying terms for CHV development.
诸如健康教育网站等消费者健康信息应用程序的发展推动了对消费者健康词汇(CHV)的研究。术语识别是词汇发展中的一项关键任务。由于消费者表达的异质性和模糊性,CHV的术语识别比专业健康词汇的术语识别更具挑战性。
为了开发CHV,我们探索了几种术语识别方法,包括协作人工审核和自动术语识别方法。
建立了一套标准以确保协作审核的一致性,该审核分析了1893个字符串。利用人工审核的结果,我们测试了两种自动方法——C值公式和逻辑回归模型。
该研究识别出753个消费者术语,并发现逻辑回归模型对CHV术语识别非常有效(受试者工作特征曲线下面积 = 95.5%)。
协作人工审核和逻辑回归方法对于识别CHV发展的术语是有效的。