Suppr超能文献

中性粒细胞的有益作用与有害作用取决于损伤的性质。

Beneficial versus detrimental effects of neutrophils are determined by the nature of the insult.

作者信息

Perl Mario, Chung Chun-Shiang, Perl Ulrike, Biffl Walter L, Cioffi William G, Ayala Alfred

机构信息

Shock-Trauma Research Laboratories, Division of Surgical Research, Department of Surgery, Rhode Island Hospital and Brown University, School of Medicine, Providence, RI 02903, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Surg. 2007 May;204(5):840-52; discussion 852-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.02.023.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Neutrophils are thought to play pivotal roles in eliminating pathogens, and they have also been implicated in end organ dysfunction associated with systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). Because modulating neutrophil survival and function has been proposed as a therapy for sepsis, it remains critical to determine under which circumstances modulating neutrophil function is efficacious. The aim of this study was to investigate whether sustaining the presence of neutrophils activated by hemorrhagic shock (HEM) would be disadvantageous during subsequent sepsis, ie, inflammation plus infection, or systemic inflammation without infection.

STUDY DESIGN

Transgenic mice, overexpressing the antiapoptotic protein Bcl-2 in a myeloid restricted fashion (Bcl-2(my)), and controls (C57) were subjected to HEM, followed 24 hours thereafter either by cecal ligation and puncture to induce sepsis, or by intraperitoneal injection of lipopolysaccharide to induce SIRS. Lung injury was assessed by bronchoalveolar lavage fluid protein and histology. Lung, plasma, and liver cytokines were quantified through CBA or ELISA.

RESULTS

In sepsis, Bcl-2(my) had increased lung neutrophil and lower lung bacteria counts compared with C57. This translated into a marked early survival benefit for Bcl-2(my). There were no differences between Bcl-2(my) and C57 with respect to the degree of lung injury or lung and plasma cytokines. In contrast, in SIRS, Bcl-2(my) exhibited markedly increased acute lung injury and lung and plasma cytokines when compared with C57. Bcl-2(my) also had a profound survival disadvantage.

CONCLUSIONS

Whether effects of prolonged survival of hemorrhage-primed neutrophils are beneficial or detrimental is determined by the nature of the second insult. During sepsis, prolonging neutrophil survival is beneficial, enhancing antimicrobial activity. Alternatively, during inflammation without infection, increased organ damage by long-lived neutrophils is detrimental.

摘要

背景

中性粒细胞被认为在清除病原体中起关键作用,并且它们也与全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)相关的终末器官功能障碍有关。由于调节中性粒细胞的存活和功能已被提议作为脓毒症的一种治疗方法,因此确定在何种情况下调节中性粒细胞功能是有效的仍然至关重要。本研究的目的是调查在随后的脓毒症(即炎症加感染)或无感染的全身炎症中,维持由失血性休克(HEM)激活的中性粒细胞的存在是否会不利。

研究设计

以髓系限制性方式过表达抗凋亡蛋白Bcl-2的转基因小鼠(Bcl-2(my))和对照组(C57)接受失血性休克,此后24小时,要么通过盲肠结扎和穿刺诱导脓毒症,要么通过腹腔注射脂多糖诱导SIRS。通过支气管肺泡灌洗液蛋白和组织学评估肺损伤。通过CBA或ELISA对肺、血浆和肝脏中的细胞因子进行定量。

结果

在脓毒症中,与C57相比,Bcl-2(my)的肺中性粒细胞增加,肺细菌计数降低。这转化为Bcl-2(my)明显的早期生存益处。在肺损伤程度或肺和血浆细胞因子方面,Bcl-2(my)和C57之间没有差异。相比之下,在SIRS中,与C57相比,Bcl-2(my)表现出明显增加的急性肺损伤以及肺和血浆细胞因子。Bcl-2(my)也有严重的生存劣势。

结论

出血引发的中性粒细胞延长存活的影响是有益还是有害取决于第二次损伤的性质。在脓毒症期间,延长中性粒细胞存活是有益的,可增强抗菌活性。相反,在无感染的炎症期间,长寿中性粒细胞增加的器官损伤是有害的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验