Steinhorst Renata Campos, Vieira José Mauro, Abdulkader Regina C R M
Division of Nephrology, Hospital das Clínicas, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ren Fail. 2007;29(3):341-5. doi: 10.1080/08860220701389922.
The effects of hemodialysis (HD) on pulmonary function are still controversial. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) and sustained low-efficiency dialysis (SLED) on the respiratory mechanics of ICU patients under invasive mechanical ventilation. We prospectively studied 31 patients. Laboratory and respiratory evaluation (static and dynamic compliance and resistance) was performed pre- and post-HD. Forty HD sessions were studied and grouped in: SLED (n = 17; Qa = 200-250 mL/min, Qd = 300 mL/min) and IHD (n = 23; Qa = 250-300 mL/min, Qd = 500 mL/min). There was no difference between the groups according to age, gender, comorbidities, APACHE II, and cause of mechanical ventilation, but pre-HD, patients in the IHD group had higher levels of plasma creatinine (5.4 +/- 2.0 vs. 4.2 +/- 1.3 mg/dL, p = 0.048) and platelets (286 +/- 186 vs. 174 +/- 95 10(3)/mm(2), p = 0.032) and lower arterial pH (7.37 +/- 0.07 vs. 7.42 +/- 0.05, p = 0.02). The efficiency of the treatment was similar (p > 0.05) with both types of HD regarding fluid removal, urea reduction rate, and decrease in plasma creatinine. Pre-HD, the ventilatory conditions of both groups were similar (p > 0.05) except for pressure support ventilation and airflow resistance. There were no changes (pre- versus post-HD p > 0.05) induced either by IHD or SLED in the ratio PaO(2)/FiO(2) or in any measured ventilatory parameter. In conclusion, neither IHD nor SLED modifies the pulmonary function of patients under mechanical ventilation.
血液透析(HD)对肺功能的影响仍存在争议。本研究的目的是评估间歇性血液透析(IHD)和持续性低效透析(SLED)对接受有创机械通气的ICU患者呼吸力学的影响。我们前瞻性地研究了31例患者。在血液透析前后进行实验室和呼吸评估(静态和动态顺应性及阻力)。共研究了40次血液透析治疗,并分为:SLED组(n = 17;血流量Qa = 200 - 250 mL/分钟,透析液流量Qd = 300 mL/分钟)和IHD组(n = 23;血流量Qa = 250 - 300 mL/分钟,透析液流量Qd = 500 mL/分钟)。两组在年龄、性别、合并症、急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)以及机械通气原因方面无差异,但在血液透析前,IHD组患者的血浆肌酐水平较高(5.4±2.0 vs. 4.2±1.3 mg/dL,p = 0.048)、血小板水平较高(286±186 vs. 174±95×10³/mm²,p = 0.032),而动脉血pH值较低(7.37±0.07 vs. 7.42±0.05,p = 0.02)。两种类型的血液透析在液体清除、尿素清除率以及血浆肌酐降低方面的治疗效果相似(p > 0.05)。血液透析前,除压力支持通气和气流阻力外,两组的通气条件相似(p > 0.05)。IHD或SLED均未引起动脉血氧分压/吸入氧浓度(PaO₂/FiO₂)比值或任何测量的通气参数发生变化(血液透析前后p > 0.05)。总之,IHD和SLED均未改变机械通气患者的肺功能。