Suppr超能文献

前列腺癌随访需要常规直肠指检吗?

Is routine digital rectal examination required for the followup of prostate cancer?

作者信息

Warren Katherine S, McFarlane Jonathan P

机构信息

Royal United Hospital, Bath, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Urol. 2007 Jul;178(1):115-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.010. Epub 2007 May 11.

Abstract

PURPOSE

With more men being diagnosed and radically treated for prostate cancer there is an increasing number of patients requiring followup. A proportion of radically treated patients have recurrence and require early salvage treatment. Traditionally followup involved physical examination, urinalysis, imaging and biopsy. Since the development of the prostate specific antigen assay, followup has largely consisted of digital rectal examination and prostate specific antigen determination. Although digital rectal examination is routinely used, its efficacy for detecting recurrent cancer in the absence of biochemical evidence of disease progression was questioned in recent studies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a literature search using the key words digital rectal examination, per rectal examination, radical prostatectomy and radical radiotherapy, and cross-referenced all results.

RESULTS

The literature that supports digital rectal examination as part of patient followup after radical prostatectomy is based on case studies and it is less applicable with more sensitive prostate specific antigen assays. In almost 5,000 patients after prostatectomy a prostate specific antigen increase reliably preceded disease recurrence, making digital rectal examination superfluous to requirements. No published literature supports repeat digital rectal examination after radical radiotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Prostate specific antigen allows the early detection of disease recurrence. Although digital rectal examination is widely used to follow patients, contemporary studies consistently show that disease progression does not occur in the absence of increasing prostate specific antigen. This suggests that remote followup of patients with prostate specific antigen alone is a safe practice, although caution should be exercised in those with higher grade tumors, which may not produce significant amounts of prostate specific antigen.

摘要

目的

随着越来越多的男性被诊断出患有前列腺癌并接受根治性治疗,需要随访的患者数量不断增加。一部分接受根治性治疗的患者会复发,需要早期挽救治疗。传统的随访包括体格检查、尿液分析、影像学检查和活检。自从前列腺特异性抗原检测方法出现以来,随访主要包括直肠指检和前列腺特异性抗原测定。尽管直肠指检是常规使用的,但最近的研究对其在没有疾病进展的生化证据时检测复发性癌症的有效性提出了质疑。

材料与方法

我们使用关键词“直肠指检”“经直肠检查”“根治性前列腺切除术”和“根治性放疗”进行文献检索,并对所有结果进行交叉引用。

结果

支持将直肠指检作为根治性前列腺切除术后患者随访一部分的文献基于病例研究,并且在更敏感的前列腺特异性抗原检测方法下适用性较低。在近5000例前列腺切除术后的患者中,前列腺特异性抗原升高可靠地先于疾病复发,使得直肠指检变得多余。没有已发表的文献支持根治性放疗后重复进行直肠指检。

结论

前列腺特异性抗原能够早期检测疾病复发。尽管直肠指检被广泛用于患者随访,但当代研究一致表明,在前列腺特异性抗原不升高的情况下不会出现疾病进展。这表明仅对患者进行前列腺特异性抗原的远程随访是一种安全的做法,尽管对于那些可能不会产生大量前列腺特异性抗原的高分级肿瘤患者应谨慎行事。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验