Spierer Lucas, Tardif Eric, Sperdin Holger, Murray Micah M, Clarke Stephanie
Neuropsychology and Neurorehabiliation Service, The Functional Electrical Neuroimaging Laboratory, Vaudois University Hospital Center, Lausanne, 1011 Switzerland.
J Neurosci. 2007 May 16;27(20):5474-83. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0764-07.2007.
Auditory spatial representations are likely encoded at a population level within human auditory cortices. We investigated learning-induced plasticity of spatial discrimination in healthy subjects using auditory-evoked potentials (AEPs) and electrical neuroimaging analyses. Stimuli were 100 ms white-noise bursts lateralized with varying interaural time differences. In three experiments, plasticity was induced with 40 min of discrimination training. During training, accuracy significantly improved from near-chance levels to approximately 75%. Before and after training, AEPs were recorded to stimuli presented passively with a more medial sound lateralization outnumbering a more lateral one (7:1). In experiment 1, the same lateralizations were used for training and AEP sessions. Significant AEP modulations to the different lateralizations were evident only after training, indicative of a learning-induced mismatch negativity (MMN). More precisely, this MMN at 195-250 ms after stimulus onset followed from differences in the AEP topography to each stimulus position, indicative of changes in the underlying brain network. In experiment 2, mirror-symmetric locations were used for training and AEP sessions; no training-related AEP modulations or MMN were observed. In experiment 3, the discrimination of trained plus equidistant untrained separations was tested psychophysically before and 0, 6, 24, and 48 h after training. Learning-induced plasticity lasted <6 h, did not generalize to untrained lateralizations, and was not the simple result of strengthening the representation of the trained lateralizations. Thus, learning-induced plasticity of auditory spatial discrimination relies on spatial comparisons, rather than a spatial anchor or a general comparator. Furthermore, cortical auditory representations of space are dynamic and subject to rapid reorganization.
听觉空间表征可能在人类听觉皮层的群体水平上进行编码。我们使用听觉诱发电位(AEP)和电神经成像分析,研究了健康受试者中空间辨别学习诱导的可塑性。刺激为持续100毫秒的白噪声突发,通过不同的双耳时间差进行侧向化。在三个实验中,通过40分钟的辨别训练诱导可塑性。训练期间,准确率从接近随机水平显著提高到约75%。训练前后,记录了对被动呈现的刺激的AEP,其中内侧声音侧向化的数量多于外侧声音侧向化(7:1)。在实验1中,训练和AEP测试使用相同的侧向化。仅在训练后,对不同侧向化的AEP调制才显著,这表明存在学习诱导的失匹配负波(MMN)。更确切地说,刺激开始后195 - 250毫秒的这种MMN源于AEP地形图对每个刺激位置的差异,这表明潜在脑网络发生了变化。在实验2中,训练和AEP测试使用镜像对称位置;未观察到与训练相关的AEP调制或MMN。在实验3中,在训练前以及训练后0、6、24和48小时,通过心理物理学方法测试了训练侧向化加上等距未训练间隔的辨别能力。学习诱导的可塑性持续时间小于6小时,不会推广到未训练的侧向化,也不是简单地加强训练侧向化表征的结果。因此,听觉空间辨别学习诱导的可塑性依赖于空间比较,而不是空间锚定或通用比较器。此外,空间的皮层听觉表征是动态的,并且容易快速重组。