Suppr超能文献

与无运动或替代疗法相比,非负重运动促进锻炼对非特异性慢性下腰痛患者结局的影响:一项系统评价

Unloaded movement facilitation exercise compared to no exercise or alternative therapy on outcomes for people with nonspecific chronic low back pain: a systematic review.

作者信息

Slade Susan C, Keating Jennifer L

机构信息

School of Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2007 May;30(4):301-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2007.03.010.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of unloaded movement facilitation exercises on outcomes for people with nonspecific chronic low back pain (NSCLBP).

METHODS

This systematic review was conducted according to Cochrane Back Review Group and Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses (QUORUM) guidelines. Exercise effects were reported as standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).

RESULTS

Six high-quality randomized controlled trials were included. For NSCLBP effects favored McKenzie therapy over intensive trunk strengthening for pain: SMD: short-term: 0.35 (0.10, 0.59); long-term 0.36 (0.12, 0.61) and short-term function: SMD: 0.45 (0.20, 0.70) and were comparable for medium-term function: SMD: 0.15 (-0.90, 0.40). Effects of favored McKenzie therapy were comparable to specific spinal stabilization exercises for short-term pain: SMD: 0.63 (-0.11, 1.38) and function: SMD: 0.47 (-0.27, 1.20). Pooled effects favored McKenzie therapy over other exercises for short-term pain (pooled SMD: 0.38 (0.14, 0.61)) and were comparable for short-term function: SMD: 0.10 (-0.20, 0.40). Yoga compared to trunk strengthening produced comparable effects for pain: (SMD: short-term: 0.13 (-0.46, 0.71); medium-term 0.51 (-0.08, 1.11)) and function SMD: short-term: 0.51 (-0.08, 1.10); medium-term 0.38 (-0.22, 0.97)). Compared to education, effects of yoga were large for medium-term pain and function (pooled SMDs: 0.92 (0.47, 1.37); 0.95 (0.50, 1.40)). Effects favored unloaded movement facilitation exercises of McKenzie compared to other or no exercise and were comparable for yoga.

CONCLUSIONS

For NSCLBP, there is strong evidence that unloaded movement facilitation exercise, compared to no exercise, improves pain and function. Compared to other types of exercise, including effort-intensive strengthening and time-intensive stabilization exercise, the effects are comparable. This challenges the role of strengthening for NSCLBP.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定无负荷运动促进训练对非特异性慢性下腰痛(NSCLBP)患者治疗效果的影响。

方法

本系统评价按照Cochrane背部评价小组和Meta分析报告质量(QUORUM)指南进行。运动效果以标准化均数差(SMD)及95%置信区间(95%CI)报告。

结果

纳入六项高质量随机对照试验。对于NSCLBP患者,在疼痛方面,麦肯齐疗法比强化躯干训练更具优势:SMD:短期为0.35(0.10,0.59);长期为0.36(0.12,0.61),短期功能方面:SMD为0.45(0.20,0.70),中期功能方面两者相当:SMD为0.15(-0.90,0.40)。在短期疼痛方面,麦肯齐疗法的效果与特定脊柱稳定训练相当:SMD为0.63(-0.11,1.38),功能方面:SMD为0.47(-0.27,1.20)。汇总效应表明,在短期疼痛方面,麦肯齐疗法比其他训练更具优势(汇总SMD:0.38(0.14,0.61)),短期功能方面两者相当:SMD为0.10(-0.20,0.40)。与躯干强化训练相比,瑜伽在疼痛方面产生的效果相当:(SMD:短期为0.13(-0.46,0.71);中期为0.51(-0.08,1.11)),功能方面SMD:短期为0.51(-0.08,1.10);中期为0.38(-0.22,0.97))。与教育相比,瑜伽在中期疼痛和功能方面效果显著(汇总SMD:0.92(0.47,1.37);0.95(0.50,1.40))。与其他训练或无训练相比,麦肯齐无负荷运动促进训练效果更佳,与瑜伽相当。

结论

对于NSCLBP患者,有强有力的证据表明,与无训练相比,无负荷运动促进训练可改善疼痛和功能。与其他类型的训练相比,包括高强度强化训练和长时间稳定训练,效果相当。这对NSCLBP强化训练的作用提出了挑战。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验