Suppr超能文献

[全球哮喘防治创议——2006年版全球哮喘防治创议]

[Global Initiative for Asthma Management and Prevention--GINA 2006].

作者信息

Kroegel C

机构信息

Pneumologie und Allergologie/Immunologie, Medizinische Klinik I, Jena, Germany.

出版信息

Pneumologie. 2007 May;61(5):295-304. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-959180.

Abstract

GINA together with many other national guidelines for the clinical management of asthma recommend a disease severity assessment in order to determine the quantity and frequency of medication. This classification scheme groups patients into one of four categories (intermittent, mild-persistent, moderate-persistent, and severe-persistent). However, it is important to recognise that asthma severity includes both severity of the underlying disease and responsiveness to treatment. In addition, severity is not an unvarying feature in any individual asthma patient and disease severity may change over months or years. Thus, for ongoing asthma management, classification using the level of control may be more relevant and useful in clinical practice. The new version of the GINA guidelines 2006 recognises these limitations of severity assessment and classifies the condition according to the level of control as "controlled", "partly controlled", and "uncontrolled" asthma on the basis of daytime symptoms, restrictions of physical activity, nocturnal symptoms/awakening, need for reliever/rescue medication, lung function (PEF or FEV1) and the frequency of exacerbations. In addition, the patient is assigned to one of five treatment "steps". Each step represents treatment options that are alternatives for controlling asthma. Moreover, steps 1 to 5 provide options of increasing efficacy. In order to maintain asthma control regular monitoring and adjustment is essential. In cases where asthma is not or only partially controlled with the current treatment regimen, step-up treatment is recommended whereas disease control allows a gradual stepping-down to the lowest possible dose of medication necessary to maintain control. This novel asthma management approach based on disease control, may facilitate acceptance and use of asthma guidelines in clinical practice.

摘要

《全球哮喘防治创议》(GINA)与许多其他哮喘临床管理的国家指南一样,建议进行疾病严重程度评估,以确定药物的用量和使用频率。这种分类方案将患者分为四类之一(间歇型、轻度持续型、中度持续型和重度持续型)。然而,必须认识到哮喘严重程度既包括基础疾病的严重程度,也包括对治疗的反应性。此外,严重程度在任何个体哮喘患者中都不是一成不变的特征,疾病严重程度可能在数月或数年中发生变化。因此,对于持续性哮喘管理,在临床实践中使用控制水平进行分类可能更具相关性和实用性。2006年版的GINA指南认识到严重程度评估的这些局限性,并根据控制水平将病情分为“控制良好”、“部分控制”和“未控制”哮喘,分类依据包括日间症状、体力活动受限、夜间症状/觉醒、使用缓解药物/急救药物的需求、肺功能(呼气峰流速或第一秒用力呼气容积)以及发作频率。此外,患者被分配到五个治疗“步骤”之一。每个步骤代表控制哮喘的替代治疗方案。而且,步骤1至5提供了疗效递增的选择。为了维持哮喘控制,定期监测和调整至关重要。如果当前治疗方案未能控制哮喘或仅部分控制哮喘,建议加强治疗;而病情得到控制则允许逐步减量至维持控制所需的最低可能药物剂量。这种基于疾病控制的新型哮喘管理方法,可能有助于在临床实践中接受和使用哮喘指南。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验