Kleinberg Krista F, Vanezis Peter, Burton A Mike
Forensic Medicine and Science, University of Glasgow G12 8QQ, Glasgow, UK.
J Forensic Sci. 2007 Jul;52(4):779-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2007.00458.x. Epub 2007 May 25.
Anthropometry can be used in certain circumstances to facilitate comparison of a photograph of a suspect with that of the potential offender from surveillance footage. Experimental research was conducted to determine whether anthropometry has a place in forensic practice in confirming the identity of a suspect from a surveillance video. We examined an existing database of photographic lineups, where one video image was compared against 10 photographs, which has previously been used in psychological research. Target (1) and test (10) photos were of high quality, although taken with a different camera. The anthropometric landmarks of right and left ectocanthions, nasion, and stomion were chosen, and proportions and angle values between these landmarks were measured to compare target with test photos. Results indicate that these measurements failed to accurately identify targets. There was also no indication that any of the landmarks made a better comparison than another. It was concluded that, for these landmarks, this method does not generate the consistent results necessary for use as evidence in a court of law.
在某些情况下,人体测量学可用于协助将嫌疑人照片与监控录像中的潜在罪犯照片进行比对。开展了实验研究,以确定人体测量学在通过监控视频确认嫌疑人身份的法医实践中是否有一席之地。我们检查了一个现有的照片列队辨认数据库,其中将一个视频图像与10张照片进行比对,该数据库先前已用于心理学研究。目标(1张)和测试(10张)照片质量很高,尽管是用不同相机拍摄的。选取了左右外眦、鼻根和口裂的人体测量标志点,并测量了这些标志点之间的比例和角度值,以将目标照片与测试照片进行比较。结果表明,这些测量未能准确识别目标。也没有迹象表明任何一个标志点的比对效果优于其他标志点。得出的结论是,对于这些标志点,该方法无法产生在法庭上用作证据所需的一致结果。