Schild Steven E, Mandrekar Sumithra J, Jatoi Aminah, McGinnis William L, Stella Phillip J, Deming Richard L, Jett James R, Garces Yolanda I, Allen Katie L, Adjei Alex A
Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Cancer. 2007 Jul 15;110(2):363-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22780.
The objective of this study was to assess the value of combined-modality therapy in elderly patients by comparing the differences in outcome between patients who received radiotherapy (RT) alone and patients who received RT plus chemotherapy for stage III nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
The North Central Cancer Treatment Group performed 2 recent Phase III trials for stage III NSCLC. The first trial, NCCTG 90-24-51, included 3 arms: once-daily RT (QDRT) alone, twice-daily RT (BIDRT) alone, and concurrent chemotherapy plus BIDRT. The second trial, NCCTG 94-24-52, included 2 arms and compared concurrent chemotherapy with either QDRT or BIDRT. The chemotherapy arms of both trials included etoposide and cisplatin administered concurrently with RT. Only the patients aged >/=65 years (elderly) who participated in those trials were included in this analysis.
Of the 166 elderly patients who were included in this analysis, 37 patients received RT alone, and 129 patients received concurrent chemotherapy plus RT. The median and 5-year survival rates were 10.5 months and 5.4% for the RT alone group compared with 13.7 months and 14.7% for the RT plus chemotherapy group (log-rank P = .05). Patients who received RT plus chemotherapy experienced significantly greater severe toxicity (grade >/=3) compared with patients who received RT alone (89.9% vs 32.4%; P < 0.01).
Elderly patients who participated in these trials appeared to gain a survival advantage from RT and chemotherapy compared with RT alone. As is the case with younger patients, this benefit came at the cost of additional toxicity.
本研究的目的是通过比较接受单纯放疗(RT)的患者与接受放疗联合化疗的III期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的结局差异,评估联合治疗对老年患者的价值。
中北部癌症治疗组近期开展了两项针对III期NSCLC的III期试验。第一项试验,NCCTG 90 - 24 - 51,包括3个组:单纯每日一次放疗(QDRT)、单纯每日两次放疗(BIDRT)以及同步化疗加BIDRT。第二项试验,NCCTG 94 - 24 - 52,包括2个组,比较同步化疗联合QDRT或BIDRT。两项试验的化疗组均包括依托泊苷和顺铂,与放疗同步给药。本分析仅纳入了参与这些试验的年龄≥65岁(老年)患者。
本分析纳入的166例老年患者中,37例接受单纯放疗,129例接受同步化疗加放疗。单纯放疗组的中位生存期和5年生存率分别为10.5个月和5.4%,而放疗加化疗组分别为13.7个月和14.7%(对数秩检验P = 0.05)。与单纯接受放疗的患者相比,接受放疗加化疗的患者出现严重毒性(≥3级)的比例显著更高(89.9%对32.4%;P < 0.01)。
参与这些试验的老年患者与单纯放疗相比,似乎从放疗和化疗中获得了生存优势。与年轻患者一样,这种获益是以额外的毒性为代价的。