Vallesi Antonino, Mussoni Alessandro, Mondani Massimo, Budai Riccardo, Skrap Miran, Shallice Tim
Cognitive Neuroscience Sector, SISSA, Trieste, Italy.
Neuropsychologia. 2007 Sep 20;45(12):2755-63. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.04.017. Epub 2007 Apr 27.
When foreperiods (FPs) of different duration vary on a trial-by-trial basis equiprobably but randomly, the RT is faster as the FP increases (variable FP effect), and becomes slower as the FP on the preceding trial gets longer (sequential effects). It is unclear whether the two effects are due to a common mechanism or to two different ones. Patients with lesions on the right lateral prefrontal cortex do not show the typical FP effect, suggesting a deficit in monitoring the FP adequately [Stuss, D. T., Alexander, M. P., Shallice, T., Picton, T. W., Binns, M. A., Macdonald, R., et al. (2005). Multiple frontal systems controlling response speed. Neuropsychologia, 43, 396-417]. The aim of this study was two-fold: (1) to replicate this neuropsychological result testing cerebral tumor patients before and after surgical removal of the tumor located unilaterally in the prefrontal, premotor or parietal cortex, respectively and (2) to investigate whether the sequential effects would change together with the FP effect (supporting single-process accounts) or the two effects can be dissociated across tumor locations (suggesting dual-process views). The results of an experiment with a variable FP paradigm show a significant reduction of the FP effect selectively after excision of tumors on right prefrontal cortex. On the other hand, the sequential effects were reliably reduced especially after surgical removal of tumors located in the left premotor region, despite a normal FP effect. The latter dissociation between the two effects supports a dual-process account of the variable FP phenomena. This study demonstrates that testing acute cerebral tumor patients represents a viable neuropsychological approach for the fractionation and localisation of cognitive processes.
当不同时长的前间隔(FPs)在逐次试验中以等概率但随机的方式变化时,反应时(RT)会随着前间隔的增加而加快(可变前间隔效应),并且会随着前一次试验中的前间隔变长而变慢(序列效应)。目前尚不清楚这两种效应是由共同机制还是两种不同机制导致的。右侧前额叶皮质有损伤的患者未表现出典型的前间隔效应,这表明在充分监测前间隔方面存在缺陷[Stuss, D. T., Alexander, M. P., Shallice, T., Picton, T. W., Binns, M. A., Macdonald, R., 等人(2005年)。多个额叶系统控制反应速度。《神经心理学》,43,396 - 417]。本研究的目的有两个:(1)通过分别对单侧位于前额叶、运动前区或顶叶皮质的肿瘤进行手术切除前后的脑肿瘤患者进行测试,来复制这一神经心理学结果;(2)研究序列效应是否会与前间隔效应一起变化(支持单过程解释),或者这两种效应是否可以在不同肿瘤位置上分离(暗示双过程观点)。一项采用可变前间隔范式的实验结果表明,在切除右侧前额叶皮质的肿瘤后,前间隔效应有选择性地显著降低。另一方面,尽管前间隔效应正常,但序列效应在手术切除位于左侧运动前区的肿瘤后尤其可靠地降低了。这两种效应之间的后一种分离支持了对可变前间隔现象的双过程解释。本研究表明,测试急性脑肿瘤患者是一种可行的神经心理学方法,可用于认知过程的分离和定位。