Suppr超能文献

改善患者和护士的结局:使用德尔菲小组对与两种患者自控镇痛方式相关的护士任务和时间进行比较。

Improving patient and nurse outcomes: a comparison of nurse tasks and time associated with two patient-controlled analgesia modalities using delphi panels.

作者信息

Evans Christopher, Schein Jeff, Nelson Winnie, Crespi Simone, Gargiulo Kathryn, Horowicz-Mehler Nathalie, Panchal Sunil

机构信息

Mapi Values, Boston, MA 02108, USA.

出版信息

Pain Manag Nurs. 2007 Jun;8(2):86-95. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2007.03.004.

Abstract

Increased demand on nursing time may adversely affect nurse satisfaction and patient outcomes. Technologies to reduce nursing time and burden may improve patient care. Two Delphi panels assessed the perceived nursing time of fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system (ITS) and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV PCA) for postoperative pain management. The panels were asked to estimate the time spent on individual nursing tasks from a list. The Clinical Trial panel (n = 14) was composed of nurses who participated in two clinical trials, and data for both PCA modalities were collected from this panel. The routine practice panel (n = 13) was composed of nurses from various hospital units, and only data for IV PCA were collected from this panel. From the Clinical Trial panel, the estimated total average task time was 251 minutes for IV PCA and 210 minutes for fentanyl ITS. From the Routine Practice panel, the estimated total average task time was 163 minutes for IV PCA. Thirteen extra tasks were identified by the Clinical Trial panel to be associated only with IV PCA, and these eliminated steps primarily explained the estimated total nursing time difference between IV PCA and fentanyl ITS. According to the two Delphi panels, the perceived nursing time consumed was less and the number of tasks was lower for fentanyl ITS than for IV PCA. This benefit associated with fentanyl ITS may lead to other positive outcomes, such as improved nurse satisfaction and improved patient outcomes.

摘要

对护理时间需求的增加可能会对护士满意度和患者预后产生不利影响。减少护理时间和负担的技术可能会改善患者护理。两个德尔菲小组评估了芬太尼离子导入透皮系统(ITS)和静脉自控镇痛(IV PCA)用于术后疼痛管理时的护理时间。要求小组从一份清单中估计在各项护理任务上花费的时间。临床试验小组(n = 14)由参与两项临床试验的护士组成,两种PCA方式的数据均从此小组收集。常规实践小组(n = 13)由来自不同医院科室的护士组成,仅从此小组收集IV PCA的数据。在临床试验小组中,IV PCA的估计总平均任务时间为251分钟,芬太尼ITS为210分钟。在常规实践小组中,IV PCA的估计总平均任务时间为163分钟。临床试验小组确定了13项仅与IV PCA相关的额外任务,这些消除的步骤主要解释了IV PCA和芬太尼ITS之间估计的总护理时间差异。根据两个德尔菲小组的评估,与IV PCA相比,芬太尼ITS的护理时间消耗更少,任务数量也更少。芬太尼ITS的这一优势可能会带来其他积极结果,如提高护士满意度和改善患者预后。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验