Suppr超能文献

具有强选择作用时的合并大小与合并时间

Coalescent size versus coalescent time with strong selection.

作者信息

Campbell R B

机构信息

Department of Mathematics, University of Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls, IA 50614-0506, USA.

出版信息

Bull Math Biol. 2007 Oct;69(7):2249-59. doi: 10.1007/s11538-007-9218-9. Epub 2007 Jun 2.

Abstract

This work studies the coalescent (ancestral pedigree, genealogy) of the entire population. The coalescent structure (topology) is robust, but selection changes the rate of coalescence (the time between branching events). The change in the rate of coalescence is not uniform, rather the reduction in the time between branching events is greatest when the coalescent is small (immediately after the common ancestor is the only member of the coalescent) with little change when the coalescent is large (immediately preceding when that common ancestor becomes fixed and the size of the coalescent is N). This provides that the reduction in the coalescent time due to selection is much greater than the reduction in the cumulative size of the coalescent (total number of ancestors of the present population after and including the most recent common ancestor) due to selection. If Ns>>1, the coalescent and fixation times are approximately equal to [Formula: see text] , which is much less than the value N which would result from neutral drift (N rather than the canonical haploid neutral fixation time 2N is the appropriate comparison for the model considered here), in particular, it is 70% less for Ns=10 and 95% less for Ns=100. However, for those values of Ns, and N ranging between 10(3) and 10(6), the reduction in the cumulative size of the coalescent of the entire population compared to the neutral case ranges from 17% to 65% (depending on the values of N and s). The coalescent time for two individuals for Ns of 10 and 100 is reduced by approximately 70% and 94%, respectively, compared with the neutral case. Because heterozygosity is proportional to the coalescent time for two individuals and the number of segregating alleles is proportional to the cumulative size of the coalescent, selection reduces heterozygosity more than it reduces the number of segregating alleles.

摘要

这项工作研究了整个人口的合并过程(祖先谱系、系谱)。合并结构(拓扑结构)是稳健的,但选择会改变合并速率(分支事件之间的时间)。合并速率的变化并不均匀,而是当合并群体较小时(紧接在共同祖先为合并群体的唯一成员之后),分支事件之间的时间减少最大,而当合并群体较大时(紧接在那个共同祖先固定且合并群体大小为N之前)变化很小。这表明由于选择导致的合并时间减少远大于由于选择导致的合并群体累积大小(包括最近共同祖先在内的当前群体祖先总数)的减少。如果Ns>>1,合并时间和固定时间近似等于[公式:见原文],这远小于中性漂变所导致的值N(对于此处考虑的模型,适当的比较是N而非标准单倍体中性固定时间2N),特别是,对于Ns = 10,它减少了70%,对于Ns = 100,减少了95%。然而,对于那些Ns值以及介于10³和10⁶之间的N值,与中性情况相比,整个人口合并群体累积大小的减少范围为17%至65%(取决于N和s的值)。与中性情况相比,对于Ns为10和100时,两个个体的合并时间分别减少了约70%和94%。因为杂合度与两个个体的合并时间成正比,而分离等位基因的数量与合并群体的累积大小成正比,所以选择对杂合度的降低作用大于对分离等位基因数量的降低作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验