Malhi Gin S, Lagopoulos Jim, Sachdev Perminder S, Ivanovski Belinda, Shnier Ron, Ketter Terence
CADE Clinic, Royal North Shore Hospital, University of Sydney, Australia.
Bipolar Disord. 2007 Jun;9(4):345-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2007.00485.x.
To determine the neural responses invoked in the recognition of facial fear and disgust in euthymic bipolar patients as compared with healthy subjects.
This study examined 10 female euthymic bipolar patients, and 10 suitably matched healthy subjects using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while subjects were engaged in an explicit facial emotion recognition task involving fear, disgust and neutral expressions. The activation paradigm involved nominating the facial expression using specified response keys. Behavioural data were collected and analysed and both within-group (Fear versus Neutral; Disgust versus Neutral) and random-effects between-group analyses were performed on fMRI data using BrainVoyager (Brain Innovations, Maastricht, the Netherlands).
Patients were equally accurate in identifying facial expressions as healthy subjects but were slower to respond, especially with respect to fear and disgust. Responses to fear and disgust (within-group analyses) resulted in activation of anticipated brain regions such as amygdala and insula, respectively. However, between-group random effects analysis revealed differential responses to both disgust and fear in both healthy subjects and euthymic bipolar patients such that euthymic bipolar patients responded largely to fear and healthy subjects responded more so to disgust. This partitioning of responsiveness was reflected by differential activation involving the hippocampus and amygdala.
Greater responsiveness to fear with hippocampal activation in patients perhaps reflects recollection of traumatic events associated with past experiences of illness or simply the use of a more mnemonic (hippocampal) as opposed to affective (amygdala) approach when performing the task. It is possible that in bipolar disorder, prefrontal-subcortical network dysfunction that relegates neural processing to limbic regions is impaired and that clinically euthymic bipolar patients, although able to accurately and effectively identify emotions such as fear and disgust, are limited in their ability to interpret their salience. The implications of these findings are discussed.
与健康受试者相比,确定处于心境正常的双相情感障碍患者在识别面部恐惧和厌恶表情时所引发的神经反应。
本研究使用功能磁共振成像(fMRI)对10名处于心境正常的女性双相情感障碍患者和10名匹配良好的健康受试者进行了检查,受试者参与了一项明确的面部表情识别任务,该任务涉及恐惧、厌恶和中性表情。激活范式包括使用指定的响应键来命名面部表情。收集并分析了行为数据,并使用BrainVoyager(荷兰马斯特里赫特的Brain Innovations公司)对fMRI数据进行了组内(恐惧与中性;厌恶与中性)和随机效应组间分析。
患者在识别面部表情方面与健康受试者同样准确,但反应较慢,尤其是在识别恐惧和厌恶表情时。对恐惧和厌恶的反应(组内分析)分别导致预期脑区(如杏仁核和脑岛)的激活。然而,组间随机效应分析显示,健康受试者和处于心境正常的双相情感障碍患者对厌恶和恐惧的反应存在差异,即处于心境正常的双相情感障碍患者主要对恐惧做出反应,而健康受试者对厌恶的反应更强。这种反应性的划分通过海马体和杏仁核的不同激活得以体现。
患者对恐惧的反应更强且海马体激活,这可能反映了与过去疾病经历相关的创伤性事件的回忆,或者仅仅是在执行任务时使用了更多的记忆(海马体)而非情感(杏仁核)方法。在双相情感障碍中,将神经处理归至边缘区域的前额叶 - 皮质下网络功能障碍可能受损,并且临床上处于心境正常的双相情感障碍患者虽然能够准确有效地识别恐惧和厌恶等情绪,但其解释这些情绪显著性的能力有限。讨论了这些发现的意义。