Ardizzoni Andrea, Boni Luca, Tiseo Marcello, Fossella Frank V, Schiller Joan H, Paesmans Marianne, Radosavljevic Davorin, Paccagnella Adriano, Zatloukal Petr, Mazzanti Paola, Bisset Donald, Rosell Rafael
Division of Medical Oncology, University Hospital, Via Gramsci 14, 43100 Parma, Italy.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007 Jun 6;99(11):847-57. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djk196.
Because the efficacy of carboplatin and cisplatin in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has not been proven to be equivalent, an individual patient data meta-analysis comparing the two treatments was performed.
Randomized trials comparing carboplatin to cisplatin in first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC were identified and their electronic databases obtained. A general variance-based method was used to estimate the summary hazard ratios (HRs), odds ratios (ORs), and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for mortality, objective response, and toxicity. Cochran's chi-square test (Q test) was used to test for heterogeneity among trials, and the I2 index, which expresses the proportion of variability of the results due to heterogeneity, was calculated. A random-effects model that takes into account interstudy variation was also applied. All statistical tests were two-sided.
Nine trials that included a total of 2968 patients were analyzed; overall median follow-up was 1021 days. The objective response rate was higher for patients treated with cisplatin than for patients treated with carboplatin (30% versus 24%, respectively; OR = 1.37; 95% CI = 1.16 to 1.61; P<.001). Carboplatin treatment was associated with a non-statistically significant increase in the hazard of mortality relative to treatment with cisplatin (HR = 1.07; 95% CI = 0.99 to 1.15; P = .100). In patients with nonsquamous tumors and those treated with third-generation chemotherapy, carboplatin-based chemotherapy was associated with a statistically significant increase in mortality (HR = 1.12; 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.23 and HR = 1.11; 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.21, respectively). Cisplatin-based chemotherapy was associated with more severe nausea and vomiting and nephrotoxicity; severe thrombocytopenia was more frequent during carboplatin-based chemotherapy.
Our individual patient data meta-analysis suggests that cisplatin-based chemotherapy is slightly superior to carboplatin-based chemotherapy in terms of response rate and, in certain subgroups, in prolonging survival without being associated with an increase in severe toxic effects. Therefore, cisplatin-based third-generation regimens should remain the standard reference for the treatment of selected patients with advanced-stage NSCLC and of those with earlier-stage disease.
由于卡铂和顺铂在治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)中的疗效尚未被证明是等效的,因此进行了一项比较这两种治疗方法的个体患者数据荟萃分析。
确定了在晚期NSCLC一线治疗中比较卡铂和顺铂的随机试验,并获取了其电子数据库。采用基于一般方差的方法来估计总风险比(HRs)、优势比(ORs)及其95%置信区间(CIs),用于评估死亡率、客观缓解率和毒性。使用 Cochr an卡方检验(Q检验)来检验试验间的异质性,并计算表示结果变异性中因异质性所占比例的I2指数。还应用了考虑研究间变异的随机效应模型。所有统计检验均为双侧检验。
分析了9项试验,共纳入2968例患者;总体中位随访时间为1021天。接受顺铂治疗的患者的客观缓解率高于接受卡铂治疗的患者(分别为30%和24%;OR = 1.37;95% CI = 1.16至1.61;P <.001)。与顺铂治疗相比,卡铂治疗使死亡风险有不具有统计学意义的增加(HR = 1.07;95% CI = 0.99至1.15;P = 0.100)。在非鳞状肿瘤患者和接受第三代化疗的患者中,基于卡铂的化疗使死亡率有统计学意义的增加(HR分别为1.12;95% CI = 1.01至1.23和HR = 1.11;95% CI = 1.01至1.21)。基于顺铂的化疗与更严重的恶心、呕吐和肾毒性相关;严重血小板减少症在基于卡铂的化疗期间更常见。
我们的个体患者数据荟萃分析表明,基于顺铂的化疗在缓解率方面略优于基于卡铂的化疗,并且在某些亚组中,在延长生存期方面不伴有严重毒性作用增加。因此,基于顺铂的第三代方案应仍然是治疗选定的晚期NSCLC患者和早期疾病患者的标准参考方案。