Suppr超能文献

罗格列酮心血管结局评估——一项中期分析。

Rosiglitazone evaluated for cardiovascular outcomes--an interim analysis.

作者信息

Home Philip D, Pocock Stuart J, Beck-Nielsen Henning, Gomis Ramón, Hanefeld Markolf, Jones Nigel P, Komajda Michel, McMurray John J V

机构信息

Newcastle Diabetes Centre and Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 2007 Jul 5;357(1):28-38. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa073394. Epub 2007 Jun 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A recent meta-analysis raised concern regarding an increased risk of myocardial infarction and death from cardiovascular causes associated with rosiglitazone treatment of type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

We conducted an unplanned interim analysis of a randomized, multicenter, open-label, noninferiority trial involving 4447 patients with type 2 diabetes who had inadequate glycemic control while receiving metformin or sulfonylurea, in which 2220 patients were assigned to receive add-on rosiglitazone (rosiglitazone group), and 2227 to receive a combination of metformin plus sulfonylurea (control group). The primary end point was hospitalization or death from cardiovascular causes.

RESULTS

Because the mean follow-up was only 3.75 years, our interim analysis had limited statistical power to detect treatment differences. A total of 217 patients in the rosiglitazone group and 202 patients in the control group had the adjudicated primary end point (hazard ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89 to 1.31). After the inclusion of end points pending adjudication, the hazard ratio was 1.11 (95% CI, 0.93 to 1.32). There were no statistically significant differences between the rosiglitazone group and the control group regarding myocardial infarction and death from cardiovascular causes or any cause. There were more patients with heart failure in the rosiglitazone group than in the control group (hazard ratio, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.30 to 3.57).

CONCLUSIONS

Our interim findings from this ongoing study were inconclusive regarding the effect of rosiglitazone on the overall risk of hospitalization or death from cardiovascular causes. There was no evidence of any increase in death from either cardiovascular causes or all causes. Rosiglitazone was associated with an increased risk of heart failure. The data were insufficient to determine whether the drug was associated with an increase in the risk of myocardial infarction. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00379769 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).

摘要

背景

最近一项荟萃分析引发了人们对罗格列酮治疗2型糖尿病会增加心肌梗死风险及心血管疾病所致死亡风险的担忧。

方法

我们对一项随机、多中心、开放标签、非劣效性试验进行了非计划的中期分析,该试验纳入了4447例接受二甲双胍或磺脲类药物治疗但血糖控制不佳的2型糖尿病患者,其中2220例患者被分配接受罗格列酮加用治疗(罗格列酮组),2227例患者接受二甲双胍加磺脲类药物联合治疗(对照组)。主要终点是因心血管疾病住院或死亡。

结果

由于平均随访时间仅为3.75年,我们的中期分析检测治疗差异的统计效力有限。罗格列酮组共有217例患者,对照组有202例患者达到判定的主要终点(风险比,1.08;95%置信区间[CI],0.89至1.31)。纳入待判定的终点后,风险比为1.11(95%CI,0.93至1.32)。罗格列酮组与对照组在心肌梗死、心血管疾病所致死亡或任何原因所致死亡方面无统计学显著差异。罗格列酮组发生心力衰竭的患者多于对照组(风险比,2.15;95%CI,1.30至3.57)。

结论

我们对这项正在进行的研究的中期结果显示,罗格列酮对因心血管疾病住院或死亡的总体风险的影响尚无定论。没有证据表明心血管疾病或所有原因所致死亡有任何增加。罗格列酮与心力衰竭风险增加相关。数据不足以确定该药物是否与心肌梗死风险增加相关。(临床试验注册号,NCT00379769[ClinicalTrials.gov]。)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验