Zibis Aristidis H, Karantanas Apostolos H, Roidis Nikolaos T, Hantes Michael E, Argiri Paraskevi, Moraitis Theofanis, Malizos Konstantinos N
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical School, University of Thessaly, 22 Papakyriazi Street, Larissa 41222, Greece.
Eur J Radiol. 2007 Jul;63(1):3-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.03.029. Epub 2007 Jun 6.
Reliability, accuracy and prognostic value of any classification system are important in evaluation and treatment of femoral head osteonecrosis. The purpose of the present study was to correlate the plain radiographs with MRI in femoral head osteonecrosis. Between 2000 and 2005, 115 hips (72 patients) were evaluated and classified according to the ARCO classification criteria with the use of plain radiographs and additional application of MRI. Classification was performed by consensus between a musculoskeletal radiologist and an orthopaedic surgeon. Sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SP), positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive value of X-rays were estimated. According to MRI, 17 hips were classified as stage I, 25 as stage II, 48 as stage III and 25 as stage IV. The SEN, SP, PPV and NPV of plain radiographs were for stage II 88%, 90.5%, 78.6% and 95%; for stage III 79.2% 82%, 80.8% and 87.2%; for stage IV 76%, 100%, 100% and 90.9%, respectively. The agreement between plain radiographs and MRI was 80.6% for staging the disease, 71.2% for recording the location of the osteonecrotic lesion, 67.1% for evaluating the size of the lesion, 79.2% for the presence of collapse of the articular surface and 56.3% for the degree of collapse. In conclusion, the ARCO classification could miss important information in stages II and III, where treatment aims at preservation of the hip joint integrity. The results of the present study suggest that MRI should be incorporated in the classification of osteonecrosis (stages II and III), to add accuracy and prognostic value.
任何分类系统的可靠性、准确性和预后价值在股骨头坏死的评估和治疗中都很重要。本研究的目的是将股骨头坏死的X线平片与磁共振成像(MRI)进行对比。在2000年至2005年期间,对115个髋关节(72例患者)进行了评估,并根据ARCO分类标准,使用X线平片并额外应用MRI进行分类。分类由一名肌肉骨骼放射科医生和一名骨科医生共同商定。估计了X线的敏感性(SEN)、特异性(SP)、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)。根据MRI,17个髋关节被分类为I期,25个为II期,48个为III期,25个为IV期。X线平片对于II期的SEN、SP、PPV和NPV分别为88%、90.5%、78.6%和95%;对于III期为79.2%、82%、80.8%和87.2%;对于IV期分别为76%、100%、100%和90.9%。在疾病分期方面,X线平片与MRI的一致性为80.6%,在记录骨坏死病变位置方面为71.2%,在评估病变大小方面为67.1%,在评估关节面塌陷情况方面为79.2%,在评估塌陷程度方面为56.3%。总之,ARCO分类在II期和III期可能会遗漏重要信息,而这两个阶段的治疗旨在保留髋关节的完整性。本研究结果表明,在骨坏死(II期和III期)的分类中应纳入MRI,以提高准确性和预后价值。