Gurbel Paul A, Bliden Kevin P, DiChiara Joseph, Newcomer Justin, Weng Willy, Neerchal Nagaraj K, Gesheff Tania, Chaganti Srivasavi K, Etherington Amena, Tantry Udaya S
Sinai Center for Thrombosis Research, Hoffberger Bldg, Suite 56, 2401 W. Belvedere Ave, Baltimore, MD 21215, USA.
Circulation. 2007 Jun 26;115(25):3156-64. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.675587. Epub 2007 Jun 11.
The antiplatelet effect of aspirin is attributed to platelet cyclooxygenase-1 inhibition. Controversy exists on the prevalence of platelet resistance to aspirin in patients with coronary artery disease and effects of aspirin dose on inhibition. Our primary aim was to determine the degree of platelet aspirin responsiveness in patients, as measured by commonly used methods, and to study the relation of aspirin dose to platelet inhibition.
We prospectively studied the effect of aspirin dosing on platelet function in 125 stable outpatients with coronary artery disease randomized in a double-blind, double-crossover investigation (81, 162, and 325 mg/d for 4 weeks each over a 12-week period). At all doses of aspirin, platelet function was low as indicated by arachidonic acid (AA)-induced light transmittance aggregation, thrombelastography, and VerifyNow. At any 1 dose, resistance to aspirin was 0% to 6% in the overall group when AA was used as the agonist, whereas it was 1% to 27% by other methods [collagen and ADP-induced light transmittance aggregation, platelet function analyzer (PFA-100)]. Platelet response to aspirin as measured by collagen-induced light transmittance aggregation, ADP-induced light transmittance aggregation, PFA-100 (81 mg versus 162 mg, P < or = 0.05), and urinary 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 was dose-related (81 mg versus 325 mg, P = 0.003). No carryover effects were observed.
The assessment of aspirin resistance is highly assay-dependent; aspirin is an effective blocker of AA-induced platelet function at all doses, whereas higher estimates of resistance were observed with methods that do not use AA as the stimulus. The observation of dose-dependent effects despite nearly complete inhibition of AA-induced aggregation suggests that aspirin may exert antiplatelet properties through non-cyclooxygenase-1 pathways and deserves further investigation.
阿司匹林的抗血小板作用归因于对血小板环氧化酶-1的抑制。冠心病患者中阿司匹林抵抗的发生率以及阿司匹林剂量对抑制作用的影响存在争议。我们的主要目的是通过常用方法测定患者血小板对阿司匹林的反应程度,并研究阿司匹林剂量与血小板抑制之间的关系。
我们对125例稳定的冠心病门诊患者进行了前瞻性研究,这些患者在一项双盲、双交叉研究中随机分组(在12周内,分别给予81、162和325mg/d,各服用4周)。在所有阿司匹林剂量下,花生四烯酸(AA)诱导的光透射聚集、血栓弹力图和VerifyNow检测显示血小板功能均较低。当以AA作为激动剂时,总体组中任何一个剂量下阿司匹林抵抗率为0%至6%,而通过其他方法[胶原和ADP诱导的光透射聚集、血小板功能分析仪(PFA-100)]检测时,抵抗率为1%至27%。通过胶原诱导的光透射聚集、ADP诱导的光透射聚集、PFA-100(81mg与162mg相比,P≤0.05)以及尿11-脱氢血栓烷B2检测的血小板对阿司匹林的反应与剂量相关(81mg与325mg相比,P = 0.003)。未观察到残留效应。
阿司匹林抵抗的评估高度依赖检测方法;阿司匹林在所有剂量下均能有效阻断AA诱导的血小板功能,而未使用AA作为刺激物的方法检测到的抵抗率更高。尽管AA诱导的聚集几乎被完全抑制,但仍观察到剂量依赖性效应,这表明阿司匹林可能通过非环氧化酶-1途径发挥抗血小板特性,值得进一步研究。