Krause Elizabeth D, Kaltman Stacey, Goodman Lisa A, Dutton Mary Ann
Department of Psychiatry, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007, USA.
Psychol Assess. 2007 Jun;19(2):165-75. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.19.2.165.
Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) studies have suggested that a model of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) that is characterized by 4 factors is preferable to competing models. However, the composition of these 4 factors has varied across studies, with 1 model splitting avoidance and numbing symptoms (e.g., D. W. King, G. A. Leskin, L. A. King, & F. W. Weathers, 1998) and the other including a dysphoria factor that combines numbing and nonspecific hyperarousal symptoms (L. J. Simms, D. Watson, & B. N. Doebbeling, 2002). Using the PTSD Checklist (F. W. Weathers, B. T. Litz, D. S. Herman, J. A. Huska, & T. M. Keane, 1993) and CFA, the authors compared these models with competing models. A model of PTSD with 4 intercorrelated factors of Intrusions, Avoidance, Dysphoria, and Hyperarousal was found superior among 396 medical patients who screened positive for intimate partner violence (IPV) and 405 women seeking services for IPV. Structural invariance testing indicated that this 4-factor model remains stable across service setting and time.
验证性因素分析(CFA)研究表明,以4个因素为特征的创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)模型优于其他竞争模型。然而,这4个因素的构成在不同研究中有所不同,其中一个模型将回避和麻木症状分开(例如,D. W. 金、G. A. 莱斯金、L. A. 金和F. W. 韦瑟斯,1998年),另一个模型包含一个将麻木和非特异性过度警觉症状结合在一起的烦躁不安因素(L. J. 西姆斯、D. 沃森和B. N. 德布林,2002年)。作者使用创伤后应激障碍检查表(F. W. 韦瑟斯、B. T. 利茨、D. S. 赫尔曼、J. A. 胡斯卡和T. M. 基恩,1993年)和验证性因素分析,将这些模型与其他竞争模型进行了比较。在396名亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)筛查呈阳性的医疗患者和405名寻求IPV服务的女性中,发现一个具有侵入、回避、烦躁不安和过度警觉4个相互关联因素的PTSD模型更为优越。结构不变性测试表明,这个4因素模型在不同服务环境和时间中保持稳定。