Suppr超能文献

膝长与大腿长压力袜及序贯加压装置的应用。

The use of knee-length versus thigh-length compression stockings and sequential compression devices.

作者信息

Brady Debra, Raingruber Bonnie, Peterson Janet, Varnau Winifred, Denman James, Resuello Raquel, De Contreaus Roumelia, Mahnke Jaime

机构信息

Division of Nursing, California State University, Sacramento, Calif 95819, USA.

出版信息

Crit Care Nurs Q. 2007 Jul-Sep;30(3):255-62. doi: 10.1097/01.CNQ.0000278926.67562.2f.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nurses on an Acute Care Evidence Based Practice Committee, creating a policy to increase patient compliance with thromboembolic deterrent stockings (TEDS) and sequential compression devices (SCDs) for deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis, found limited literature on patient preference and response to this treatment.

STUDY AIM

The study purpose was to determine whether knee-length or thigh-length TEDS and/or SCDs were more comfortable, correctly applied, and worn by patients, and to assess patient reasons for noncompliance.

METHOD

A patient survey and observational data tool was designed. Six surveyors collected data (interrater reliability = 93%) from 137 randomly selected patients with orders for TEDS and/or SCDs admitted to acute care medical or surgical nursing units.

RESULTS

Most patients wore thigh-length SCDs and TEDS. However, only 29.2% (n = 40) had SCDs on them at the time of survey, and 62.8% (n = 86) were compliant with TEDS. The most common reasons given for noncompliance with SCDs were that the devices were not reapplied after bathing or ambulating, or were removed because they were hot or itchy. Complaints of discomfort were highest among patients wearing thigh-length SCDs and TEDS. Problems with fit were 50% higher in those who wore thigh-length TEDS, and involved stockings that created restricting bands. Most patients understood the purpose of treatment, and older patients were more compliant than younger patients.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Knee-length TEDS and SCDs are more comfortable for patients, encourage higher levels of compliance with treatment, do not pose a risk for venous stasis to patients by creating restricting bands, and are less expensive. Patients need ongoing education to resume wearing TEDS and SCDs after activities of daily living, and knee-length stockings and devices would be easier to reapply. The policy in our institution was changed for the use of knee-length compression stockings and SCDs.

摘要

背景

急性护理循证实践委员会的护士们在制定一项政策,以提高患者对用于预防深静脉血栓形成的血栓栓塞防护袜(TEDS)和序贯加压装置(SCDs)的依从性,结果发现关于患者偏好和对此类治疗反应的文献有限。

研究目的

本研究旨在确定膝长或大腿长的TEDS和/或SCDs对患者而言是否更舒适、应用是否正确以及穿着情况如何,并评估患者不依从的原因。

方法

设计了一份患者调查问卷和观察数据工具。六名调查员从137名随机选取的、入住急性护理内科或外科护理单元且有TEDS和/或SCDs医嘱的患者中收集数据(评分者间信度 = 93%)。

结果

大多数患者穿着大腿长的SCDs和TEDS。然而,调查时只有29.2%(n = 40)的患者身上有SCDs,62.8%(n = 86)的患者依从TEDS。不依从SCDs的最常见原因是洗澡或活动后装置未重新应用,或者因感觉热或痒而被取下。穿着大腿长的SCDs和TEDS的患者中不适投诉最多。穿着大腿长TEDS的患者中尺寸不合问题高出50%,涉及产生束缚带的袜子。大多数患者理解治疗目的,老年患者比年轻患者更依从。

对实践的启示

膝长的TEDS和SCDs对患者更舒适,能鼓励更高的治疗依从性,不会因产生束缚带而给患者带来静脉淤滞风险,且成本更低。患者在日常生活活动后需要持续接受教育以重新穿上TEDS和SCDs,膝长的袜子和装置更容易重新应用。我们机构的政策已改为使用膝长的加压袜和SCDs。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验