Suppr超能文献

痴呆症知识转化:一项整群随机试验,比较混合式学习方法与全科医生质量改进小组中的“传统”高级培训。

Knowledge translation on dementia: a cluster randomized trial to compare a blended learning approach with a "classical" advanced training in GP quality circles.

作者信息

Vollmar Horst C, Butzlaff Martin E, Lefering Rolf, Rieger Monika A

机构信息

Competence Center for General Practice and Outpatients' Health Care, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Jun 22;7:92. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-92.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Thus far important findings regarding the dementia syndrome have been implemented into patients' medical care only inadequately. A professional training accounting for both, general practitioners' (GP) needs and learning preferences as well as care-relevant aspects could be a major step towards improving medical care. In the WIDA-study, entitled "Knowledge translation on dementia in general practice" two different training concepts are developed, implemented and evaluated. Both concepts are building on an evidence-based, GP-related dementia guideline and communicate the guideline's essential insights.

METHODS/DESIGN: Both development and implementation emphasize a procedure that is well-accepted in practice and, thus, can achieve a high degree of external validity. This is particularly guaranteed through the preparation of training material and the fact that general practitioners' quality circles (QC) are addressed. The evaluation of the two training concepts is carried out by comparing two groups of GPs to which several quality circles have been randomly assigned. The primary outcome is the GPs' knowledge gain. Secondary outcomes are designed to indicate the training's potential effects on the GPs' practical actions. In the first training concept (study arm A) GPs participate in a structured case discussion prepared for by internet-based learning material ("blended-learning" approach). The second training concept (study arm B) relies on frontal medical training in the form of a slide presentation and follow-up discussion ("classical" approach).

DISCUSSION

This paper presents the outline of a cluster-randomized trial which has been peer reviewed and support by a national funding organization--Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)--and is approved by an ethics commission. The data collection has started in August 2006 and the results will be published independently of the study's outcome.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials [ISRCTN36550981].

摘要

背景

迄今为止,关于痴呆综合征的重要研究成果在患者医疗护理中的应用还不够充分。开展一项兼顾全科医生(GP)需求与学习偏好以及护理相关方面的专业培训,可能是改善医疗护理的重要一步。在名为“全科医疗中痴呆症的知识转化”的WIDA研究中,开发、实施并评估了两种不同的培训概念。这两种概念均基于循证的、与全科医生相关的痴呆症指南,并传达该指南的关键见解。

方法/设计:开发和实施过程均强调一种在实践中被广泛接受的程序,从而能够实现高度的外部效度。这尤其通过培训材料的准备以及针对全科医生质量改进小组(QC)得以保证。通过比较随机分配了若干质量改进小组的两组全科医生,对这两种培训概念进行评估。主要结果是全科医生的知识增益。次要结果旨在表明培训对全科医生实际行动的潜在影响。在第一个培训概念(研究组A)中,全科医生参与由基于互联网的学习材料准备的结构化病例讨论(“混合学习”方法)。第二个培训概念(研究组B)依赖于以幻灯片展示和后续讨论形式进行的面授医学培训(“传统”方法)。

讨论

本文介绍了一项整群随机试验的概要,该试验已通过同行评审并获得国家资助机构——联邦教育与研究部(BMBF)的支持,且已获伦理委员会批准。数据收集于2006年8月开始,结果将独立于研究结果发表。

试验注册

当前受控试验[ISRCTN36550981]

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/869d/1931439/98866709347e/1472-6963-7-92-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验